三种方法治疗滋养细胞肿瘤疗效评价.docVIP

三种方法治疗滋养细胞肿瘤疗效评价.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
三种方法治疗滋养细胞肿瘤疗效评价

三种方法治疗滋养细胞肿瘤的疗效评价   [摘要] 目的 探讨滋养细胞肿瘤的三种治疗方法的可行性及其疗效。 方法 选择从2011 年7月~2012年10月我院就诊被诊断绒癌及侵蚀性葡萄胎患者,根据其年龄、有无生育要求、病灶大小及肌层侵犯深度、治疗前血HCG水平、有无转移等因素分成三组;A组:射频消融联合化疗组,B组:子宫全切手术+化疗组,C组:单纯化疗组。对三组疗效进行评价。 结果 三组患者的治疗有效率分别为100.0%、91.7%、91.7%,三种治疗方法疗效之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 化疗是滋养细胞肿瘤的首选及主要的治疗手段。对于较年轻、有生育要求患者射频消融联合化疗可以作为首选治疗方法。对于年龄较大、有转移并无生育要求患者来说子宫全切手术联合化疗是最好的选择。对于滋养细胞肿瘤患者采取以化疗为主,手术及自凝刀治疗为辅的个体化治疗手段,可获得满意的治疗效果。   [关键词] 滋养细胞肿瘤;化疗;子宫全切术;射频技术   [中图分类号] R737.33 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2015)23-0044-03   Efficacy evaluation of three methods in treatment of trophoblastic tumor   Shaadaiti?Wufuer Buhaiqiemu?Kadeer Gulina?Ababaikeli   Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China   [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of three treatment methods for trophoblastic tumor. Methods The patients diagnosed with choriocarcinoma and invasive mole in our hospital from July 2011 to October 2012 were selected and divided into three groups according to their age, with or without fertility requirements, size of focus and invasive depth of muscular layer, pre-treatment blood HCG level, and with or without metastasis. Group A was radiofrequency ablation group, group B was hysterectomy+chemotherapy group, and group C was simple chemotherapy group. Efficacy of the three groups was evaluated. Results The effective treatment rates of the three groups were 100.0%, 91.7% and 91.7% respectively. The three treatment methods were not statistically different in the efficacy(P>0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy is the first choice and main treatment method of trophoblastic tumor. For younger patients with fertility requirements, radiofrequency ablation combined with chemotherapy can serve as the preferred treatment method. For elder patients with metastasis and without fertility requirements, hysterectomy combined with chemotherapy is the best choice. For patients with trophoblastic tumor, chemotherapy, supplemented by surgical

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档