- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
口腔种植修复在牙列缺损治疗中应用与临床有效性研究
口腔种植修复在牙列缺损治疗中应用与临床有效性研究
【摘要】 目的 研究并探讨口腔种植修复在牙列缺损治疗中的应用效果。方法 90例牙列缺损患者, 随机分为对照组和观察组, 每组45例。对照组实施口腔固定义齿修复, 观察组实施口腔种植修复, 比较两组患者的临床治疗效果、并发症发生率、美学效果以及满意度。结果 观察组的临床显效率为91.11%, 高于对照组的73.33%, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组并发症发生率明显低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组修复后的牙体外形评分、色泽评分分别为(87.73±2.45)、(87.84±2.87)分, 高于对照组的(84.13±2.82)、(82.78±2.82)分, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组的满意度为84.44%, 高于对照组的64.44%, 差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 在牙列缺损的治疗中实施口腔种植修复具有显著的临床疗效, 可有效减少并发症的发生, 提高口腔修复的美观度及患者满意度。
【关键词】 牙列缺损;固定义齿修复;种植修复
DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.05.006
Study on application of oral implant restoration in the treatment of dentition defect and its clinical efficacy HUANG Hai, GUO Guan-sheng, LAI Ren-fa, et al. Foshan City Shunde District Daliang Hospital, Foshan 528300, China
【Abstract】 Objective To study the application effect of oral implant restoration in the treatment of dentition defect. Methods A total of 90 dentition defect patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 45 cases in each group. The control group received oral fixed partial denture restoration, and the observation group received oral implant restoration. Comparison were made on clinical treatment effect, incidence of complications, aesthetic effect and satisfaction degree in two groups. Results The observation group had higher clinical effective rate as 91.11% than 73.33% in the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of complications than the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had tooth shape score and color score respectively as (87.73±2.45) and (87.84±2.87) points after restoration, which were higher than (84.13±2.82) and (82.78±2.82) points in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P0.05). The observation group had higher satisfaction degree as 84.44% than 64.44% in the control group, and the difference had statistical signific
文档评论(0)