直肠癌延误诊治影响因素及临床处理对策.docVIP

直肠癌延误诊治影响因素及临床处理对策.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
直肠癌延误诊治影响因素及临床处理对策

直肠癌延误诊治影响因素及临床处理对策   doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2014.22.67   摘要目的:研究探讨导致直肠癌延误诊治的主要原因以及相应的临床处理措施。方法:收治延误诊治的直肠癌患者19例作为研究对象,对患者的基本临床资料进行回顾,分析患者延误诊治的主要原因及影响因素,并针对不同的原因制定针对性的临床处理措施,观察患者的临床治疗效果,统计治疗有效率并进行5~7年的随访。结果:经再次检查确诊的患者,按病理类型分类,高分化腺癌2例,中分化腺癌10例,低分化腺癌4例,黏液腺癌1例,乳头状腺癌2例;按照直肠癌的Dukes改良分期标准分类,B2期8例,C1期6例,C2期3例,D期2例。根据患者的病情分别实施化疗(2例),直肠癌根治术(12例),姑息手术(5例)。治疗后,对患者进行5~7年的随访,患者的1年生存率78.9%(15/19),3年生存率52.6%(10/19),5年生存率26.3%(5/19)。结论:导致直肠癌的诊断和治疗发生延误的原因涉及到患者自身对相关疾病知识和医疗常识的匮乏、医护工作者的医疗水平、医生在诊断中的疏忽等。医院要从提高直肠癌的临床检测技术和加强医护工作者的责任心培养,强化对相关疾病知识的普及入手,降低直肠癌延误诊断的发生率,提高临床治疗的有效率。   关键词直肠癌;延误诊断;影响因素;对策措施   Influence factors and clinical treatment countermeasures of delayed diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer   Yuan Xiaoyu   The People’s Hospital of Chenxi County,Huaihua City,Hunan 419500   AbstractObjective:To study and explore the primary causes and corresponding clinical treatment countermeasures of delayed diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.Methods:19 rectal cancer patients with delayed diagnosis and treatment were selected. They were as the research objects.The basic clinical data of patients were reviewed.The main reasons and influencing factors of delayed diagnosis and treatment of patients were analyzed.The specific clinical treatment countermeasures were formulated in view of the different reasons.The clinical curative effects of patients were observed.The treatment effective rate was statistics and the patients were given 5 to 7 years follow-up.Results:The patients were confirmed by checking again,according to the pathological classification;2 cases were high differentiated adenocarcinoma;10 cases were moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma;4 cases were low differentiated adenocarcinoma;1 case was mucinous adenocarcinoma;2 cases were papillary adenocarcinoma.According to the colorectal cancer Dukes improvement staging standards classification,8 cases were B2 stage;6 cases were C1 stage;3 cases were C2 stage;2 cases were D stage.The treatment was respectively im

文档评论(0)

189****7685 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档