变更起诉罪名论文：变更起诉罪名控审分离公诉变更诉讼客体辩护权（毕业学术论文设计）.docVIP

l 变更起诉罪名论文：变更起诉罪名 控审分离 公诉变更 诉讼客体 辩护权 【中文摘要】我国刑事诉讼法中关于法院变更起诉罪名问题的规定是欠缺的,最高人民法院相关的司法解释也过于模糊和笼统,导致司法实践中法院变更起诉罪名出现很大的随意性,惹起了诸多争议。法院能否变更指控罪名?如果可以变更,其范围如何?这些成为理论界研究的热点,也成为司法实务中迫切需要解决的问题。本文主要从法院变更起诉罪名的涵义、形式等入手,采用比较研究和实证分析的方法,融理论研究与实践分析于一体,围绕法院变更起诉罪名的理论基础、其他国家和地区现行的相关法律规定,分析了我国法院变更起诉罪名的司法现状及其利弊,对现行司法条件下法院变更起诉罪名的完善提出一些设想。本文除去引言和结语共分为四个部分。第一部分,我国法院变更起诉罪名的概述,包括变更起诉罪名的涵义、形式,并从多角度对法院变更起诉罪名的成因进行了分析,以期对法院变更起诉罪名有一个宏观的把握。第二部分,分析了法院变更起诉罪名的价值理念与理论基础。第三部分,以比较法的视角,介绍了不同国家和地区关于法院变更起诉罪名的立法规定并做了原因分析,以期对构建我国法院变更起诉罪名的理论和制度有所启示。第四部分,我国目前法院变更起诉罪名在司法实践中的表现。本文在分析我国法院变更起诉罪名利弊的基础上,提出了我国法院变更起诉罪名的理论以及制度的完善。主要针对当前我国的司法现状,从法院变更起诉罪名的前提条件、范围、模式选择、提出主体、程序设计以及配套措施的角度提出了完善我国法院变更起诉罪名的一些设想。 【英文摘要】In our country,the present law of Criminal Procedure Law makes limited provisions to change the prosecution of offenses in court.Also the relevant judicial interpretations are too general.this makes the judge change the prosecution of offenses at will and spark much intense theoretical debate.whether the judge can change the prosecution of offenses in court and if can change,to what extent can change become the focus of theoretical research,and also become the question which pressing settled.this paper focus on studying the concept,form and so on.the authour adopt analytical way combining with demonstrative analysis way,and also combine theoretical research with practice analysis.on the basis of analysis the basic theory,the relavant legal provisions in any other countries and regions,our courtry’s current situation,the advantages and disadvantages to change,the authour put forward some ideas about how to reform and improve the problem that is to change the prosecution of offenses in court.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part summarizes the cases of changing the procecution of offenses in court,including the concept,the form and analyze the reasons of change the prosecution of offenses from mutiple perspectives,in order to get macroscopical understandings.The second part analyses the values and theo