法律庭审互动中语用预设现象分析-外国语言学及应用语言学专业论文.docx

独创性声明本人声明所呈交的论文是我个人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得 的研究成果。尽我所知，除了文中特别加以标注和致谢的地方外，论文中 独创性声明 本人声明所呈交的论文是我个人在导师指导下进行的研究工作及取得 的研究成果。尽我所知，除了文中特别加以标注和致谢的地方外，论文中 不包括其他人已经发表或撰写过的研究成果，也不包含为获得西北师范大 学或其他教育机构的学位或证书而使用过的材料。与我一同工作的同志对 本研究所做的任何贡献均已在论文中作了明确的说明并表示了谢意。 签名： 日期： 关于论文使用授权的说明 本人完全了解西北师范大学有关保留、使用学位论文的规定，即：学 校有权保留送交论文的复印件，允许论文被查阅和借阅；学校可以公布论 文的全部或部分内容，可以采用影印、缩印或其他复制手段保存论文。 （保密的论文在解密后应遵守此规定） 签名： 导师签名： 日期： i Abstract The concept of presupposition originates from philosophy and logic. But the study on presupposition is the most popular in the linguistic field. Although the research on presupposition has made many achievements, there are not deep researches at home and abroad on the courtroom presupposition. Furthermore, their researches on presuppositions are confined to describe how lawyers employ presuppositions in trial inquiry. In fact, not only lawyers use the strategy of presupposition, but also judges, prosecutors and both of parties use the strategy. Given the confrontational and goal-oriented feature of courtroom trials, it is of great necessity for us to explain the presupposition in courtroom interactions from the cognitive-pragmatic perspective. With the guidance of relevance theory proposed by Sperber and Wilson (1995), this thesis analyzes the presupposition generation, understanding, characteristics and its role in courtroom interactions through some specific cases from both descriptive and interpretive approach to help people understand the presupposition in courtroom trial deeply and provide a new prospective on presupposition study. The present study attempts to explore the generation, characteristics, defeasibility of pragmatic presuppositions in Chinese courtroom trial with the relevance-theoretical model of presupposition. The data in the present study are collected from three civil cases. All three civil cases are from Lanzhou Intermediate People’s Court. The overall Chinese characters are over 22,000 transcribed from more than 8 hours of recordings in total. According t