犯罪数额问题分析-刑法学专业论文.docx

3 3 标准不统一、同种犯罪中单位犯罪数额高于自然人犯罪数额、近似犯罪中 国家工作人员犯罪数额高于一般自然人犯罪数额等。笔者提出应当以犯罪 地所在的省、自治区、直辖市人民政府公布的上年度“最低工资的一定倍 数”为参数来统一犯罪数额标准的设想。具体设想是：由全国人大常委会 对现行刑法典中有关各类犯罪的“数额较大”、“数额巨大”等概括性规定统 一进行立法解释,具体规定为犯罪地所在的省、自治区、直辖市人民政府 公布的上年度最低工资的一定倍数。犯罪地所在的省、自治区、直辖市人 民政府公布的上年度最低工资，可以真实地反映体现某一地区的经济水 平，而且能够随着经济的发展而变化，能较为准确的反映犯罪行为的社会 危害性；司法机关也可以通过采用国家有关部门公布的权威数据，不需要 花费时间和精力去统计测算有关数据，减轻了司法部门的工作负担。最后， 本文也对我国现行《刑法》中涉及犯罪数额的相关条款进行了梳理和修正。 关键词：犯罪数额 理论依据 定罪量刑 计算 立法现状 完善构想 PAGE PAGE 1 Abstract Crime, like other things, is an entia of quality and quantity.The essential feature of crime is the harm on society from the degree of punishability. The quality of crime is the crime’s harm on society while the quantity refers to the degree of such crime on society. Both are the prescriptive nature of crime. The property of punishability is a quantitative limit between crime and non-crime, the degree of crimes and the entia of the quality and quantity of crime. When the degree of the harm on society from a certain act reaches a “critical point”, that is, reaching the degree of punishability, it constitutes a crime. A qualitative analysis of crime is an analysis of the prescriptive nature of the quality of crime, and a quantitative analysis of crime is an analysis of crime in terms of the prescriptive nature of the quantity, or the degree of its harm on society. A definite amount in crime is an important factor in the quantitative analysis of crime, which plays a significant role in distinguishing criminal acts from ordinary law-breaking acts. On the basis of the legislation and practices of other countries and in relation to the current conditions of our country, this paper probes into relevant problems of the definite amount in crime, in the hope of providing some merits to the criminal theories and practices. This paper consists of five parts, about 50,000 words. Part I: An Overview to a Definite Amount in Crime. Based on the amount and the quantity, this part argues that a definite amount in crime is a quantity