中国的崛起对俄罗斯是借鉴否isch水inaamodelforrussia.pptVIP

Back to the USSR? Questions Contact Info Jean Robinson robinso@indiana.edu + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Is China a Model for Russia? Comparing Dominant and One-Party Systems Jean C. Robinson, Chief Reader, AP Comp GoPo Professor of Political Science, Indiana University robinso@indiana.edu AP Comparative Government Politics “Everyone here sees China as the model, since Russia is not the model.” D. Kosyrev SOURCE: New York Times October 18, 2009 Wang Jianwei/Xinhua Learning outcomes : ?We will discuss key factors for distinguishing among different types of party and party systems and develop methods for teaching these distinctions to students. ?We will develop analytic categories for determining whether China might be a model for Russia, by comparing how different kinds of party systems might be more effective with regard ?to efficiency, corruption, and meeting social needs. ?You will be provided with some data on measures of party membership, stability, economic growth, and corruption for both countries, and then design student assignments that use the measures to compare the party systems, paying special attention to multi party, dominant party and single party systems. What is it that Russian leaders see as admirable about Chinese party system? And what can this tell us about ways to compare teach and compare political parties? Party System Typologies Two party Multi Party One Party (dominant party) Two Party and Multi Party Systems TWO PARTY: TWO POLITICAL PARTIES DOMINANT TO SUCH AN EXTENT THAT ELECTORAL SUCCESS UNDER THE BANNER OF A THIRD PARTY IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE. OFTEN THE BREADTH OF REPRESENTATION OF POLITICAL VALUES AND IDEOLOGIES IS LIMITED, AND OFTEN THE POLITICAL STANCES OF THE TWO PARTIES CONVERGE ON SOME SHARED CONSENSUS. MULTI PARTY: SYSTEMS IN WHICH MORE THAN TWO PARTIES COMPETE, REPRESENT DIVERSE POLITICAL INTERESTS, AND ARE ELECTED TO PUBLIC OFFICE. OFTEN SUCH PARTY SYSTEMS RESULT IN COA