- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
第二讲accetance
ACEPTANCE ACEPTANCE: Your Objectives The definition of acceptance; The distinction between an acceptance and a counter offer; The communication of the offer; The rules as to communication of acceptance; The rules as to revocation of an acceptance DEFINITION OF AN ACCEPTANCE An acceptance is a final and unqualified agreement( an unconditional assent) of the terms of an offer. Mirror image rule: To make a binding contract the acceptance must exactly match the offer. The offeree must accept all the terms of the offer. ACCEPTANCE See: Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Co. (1877 ) The acceptance can be expressed verbally or in writing. It can even be implied by conduct. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACCEPTANCE AND A COUNTER OFFER Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd v. Ex-Cell-O Corporation (England) Ltd [1979] Was the price variation clause a term of the contract? It was held that this clause was not a term. The buyers order was not an acceptance but a counter-offer. The seller had accepted the buyers counter-offer by signing and returning the tear-off slip. Silence As Acceptance-General Rule Acceptance of an offer will not be implied from the offeror. The offeror cannot impose a contractual obligation upon the offeree by stating that ,unless the offeree expressly rejects the offer he will be held to have accepted it. Silence As Acceptance Felthouse v. Bindley (1862) The vital question was whether the claimant was the owner of the horse at the date of the auction sale. It is clear that there was no complete bargain on January 2: it is also clear that the uncle had no right to impose upon the nephew a sale of his horse for £30.15s. unless he chose to comply with the condition of writing to repudiate the offer. Silence As Acceptance It is clear, therefore, that the nephew in his own mind intended his uncle to have the horse at the price which he (the uncle) had named, £30.15s: but he had not communicated such his intention to his uncle, or done anything to bind himself.
原创力文档


文档评论(0)