美国专利诉讼及337调查.ppt

* * * * * * * * * * Appeal to Federal Circuit 上诉到联邦巡回法庭 Final Determination is appealable to Federal Circuit within 60 D. 最终判决可在60日内被上诉到联邦巡回法院 ITC is an administrative agency charged to protect US domestic industries. It is not entirely impartial to foreign entities. ITC是一个对美国国内产业进行保护的行政机构。对外国企业不见得能完全做到公平对待。 Federal Circuit is in legal branch charge with impartial resolution of disputes between parties. Therefore, appeal to the Federal Circuit may get a more impartial decision. 联邦巡回法院是一个司法机构，需要对当事人双方都公平对待。因此，上诉到联邦巡回法院会获得一个更加公平的答案。 Any person adversely affected by the final determination can appeal (even non-party at ITC). 即便不是ITC案中的当事人，任何受到最终判决影响的人，都可以上诉。 浙江通领集团案 Genreal Protecht v. ITC (GFCI 安全插座) General Protecht Group, Inc. (“浙江通领集团”), Wenzhou Tri-mone Science and Technology Electric Co., Ltd. (温州三蒙科技电气有限公司 ), and Shanghai ELE Manufacturing Corp. (上海益而益电器制造有限公司 ) 2009 - ITC ruled that General Protecht infringes Leviton’s patent 2009年- ITC判决浙江通领集团侵害Leviton公司的专利 2010 – Federal Circuit: no infringement of some claims 2010年-联邦上诉法院判定：部分权利要求并不存在侵权 Although the appellants raised several issues, challenging the Commission‘s determination of infringement, the court found most of them unpersuasive.? Nevertheless, the majority concluded that the Commission had erred in some respects and reversed in part and remand. 虽然法院认为上诉者提出的很多理由不具有说服力，但认为部分判决有错。 Appeal to Federal Circuit 上诉到联邦巡回法院 Any person adversely affected by the final determination can appeal (even non-party at ITC). 即便不是ITC调查中的当事人，任何受到最终判决影响的人，都可以提起上诉。 The Technology In Issue 争议的技术 3G divided between competing standards 第三代行动电话(3G)的标准有两种： Global System for Mobility (GSM) 全球移动系统 （GSM） Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) 码分多址技术 (CDMA) Osha ? Liang Houston ? Silicon Valley ? Paris Broadcom v. Qualcom 博通v.高通案 The Technology In Issue 争议的技术 Qualcomm is dominant player in CDMA, holds 1400+ patents Qualcomm公司在CDMA领域是主导者，并持有超过1400个专利。 Qualcomm also hold