（外文电子版资料）14. Dialogue On The Way Of Knowledge - Part III.docVIP

Dialogue On The Way Of Knowledge - Part lll ? ? ? Ive added, what Im calling, Dialogue on the Way of Knowledge, to my site, Carlos Castanedas don Juans Teachings. It began Mon, Jun 28th, 1999, when I received an E-Mail from Michael. I will use M: to begin his comments, R: to begin mine. This is part three of the dialogue. It continues where part 2 left off. Here, Ive sent Michael a few of the E-mails Id received from others and asked his opinion about some of the content. Ive decided not to include those here but rather, just leave Michaels comments. You can kind of guess what must have been said by his replys.? ? ?? ? ?M: It is always extraordinarily difficult to learn what others really are. In my approaches, before I can establish a link so that I can know through perception (the purest form of knowledge), then the literal word must be used. When people claim to be a (xxxx) [fill in the blank label] it is never obvious if they require a label or a title to somehow link themselves to something as a matter of dependency. If a label is affixed by themselves as a matter of dependency, then it only follows that they have not sufficiently lost the human form and that speaks oceans concerning where they are as seekers of the way.? ? ?M: Ever since CC and DJM introduced the world to the term nagual, it has become rather overused, I fear. The overuse causes me to think of the terms religious and spiritual. I have begun to wonder if individuals really understand what the term means ... ? ? ?M: Ah, humm, flag flying. The lowest brain as a point of devolution would be the primal brain: the hypothalamic brain. There is no reason in this function only metabolic regulation, emotion, and passion. The center that has been imaged in science during anger has been quite literally shown to surround the center that holds maximal energy during love. From this, it can be surmised, that the center for anger surrounds and blocks the center for love in terms of its energe