合约的履行弃权与禁反言PERFORMANCEWAIVERANDESTOPPEL.PPTVIP

合约的履行弃权与禁反言PERFORMANCEWAIVERANDESTOPPEL.PPT

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
合约的履行弃权与禁反言PERFORMANCEWAIVERANDESTOPPEL

共识性禁反言 (Estoppel by convention) The principles applicable to the assertion of an estoppel by convention…are as follows: (i) It is not enough that the common assumption upon which the estoppel is based is merely understood by the parties in the same way. It must be expressly shared between them. (ii) The expression of the common assumption by the party alleged to be estopped must be such that he may properly be said to have assumed some element of responsibility for it, in the same of conveying to the other party an understanding that he expected the other party to rely upon it. (iii) The person alleging the estoppel must in fact have relied upon the common assumption to a sufficient extent, rather than merely upon his own independent view of the matter. (iv) That reliance must have occurred in connection with some subsequent mutual dealing between the parties. (v) Some detriment must thereby have been suffered by the person alleging the estoppel, or benefit thereby have been conferred upon the person alleged to be estopped, sufficient to make it unjust or unconscionable for the latter to assert the true legal (or factual) position. 禁反言 (Estoppel) 共识性禁反言 (Estoppel by convention) 明示沟通过的共识 (Expressly shared common assumption) 对双方达成共识或假设有一定的责任 (Assumed some element of responsibility) 依赖 (Reliance) 体现在双方随后的交往中 (In connection with subsequent mutual dealing) 损害或益处足够让偏离双方对于法律或事实的共识不公平或不合情理 (Detriment or benefit sufficient to make it unjust or unconscionable to assert the true legal or factual position) 禁反言 (Estoppel) 产权性禁反言 (Proprietary estoppel) If A, under an expectation created or encouraged by B that A shall have a certain interest in land, thereafter, on the faith of such expectation and with the knowledge of B and without objection from him, acts to his detriment in connection with such land, a Court of Equity will compel B to give effect to such expectation. 陈述 (Representation) 依赖 (Reliance) 损害 (Detriment) 禁反言 (Estoppel) 合约性禁反言 (Contractual estoppel)

文档评论(0)

suijiazhuang1 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档