国际货币基金组织决策机制改革研究-法学；国际法学专业论文.docxVIP

IV IV decision .I think that, in addition to the basic approach of expanding the total amount of IMF funds and the increase the advantage of those developing countries, particularly emerging market countries，setting up a preposition procedure for discussion and reform the structureof the IMF Executive Board is also contribute tothis goal.the preposition procedure for discussion is to resolve vote on one-time consultation to two-step,firstly,any sovereign has her right equally to submit their question or concern to the Board of Executive Directors or the Council and all the member States make their decision in accordance with the principle of one- country-one-vote ;Secondly,the council make the final review and voting according to the weighted majority voting system ,which helps the developing countries to maximize their interests and concerns into the IMFs decision-making process,and enhance the voice of developing countries; the reform on the regional composition, production methods and selection criteria of the IMF Executive Board members including the IMFPresident is conducive to change the situation that Western developed countries control the IMF Executive Board and help to guide the IMF in right direction, to maintain the fair. The important aspect of the reform of IMF is the strength of the implementation of IMF policy in fair.Despite the IMF agreement regulates various punitive measures,but compared with the dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization,these measures have obvious Soft international law feature,the performance of the feature include the general on the law, the deficient on the measure, the lack of a clear ruling institutions, more importantly,these measures are applicable in developed and developing countries obviously unequally,even intervent the economic sovereignty of developing countries.I think that IMFshould study the experienceoftheWorld Trade Organization mechanism on the settlement Of dispute,which