Value- Driven- Security- Threat- Modeling-for- Off- The- Shelf-课件.pptVIP

下载本文档

0
0
约6.31千字
约 24页
2019-05-17 发布于湖北
举报
版权申诉

Value- Driven- Security- Threat- Modeling-for- Off- The- Shelf-课件.ppt

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

T-MAP Framework Step 1: Identify key stakeholders and value propositions (the treasures in the castle); Step 2: Establish a set of security evaluation criteria based on stakeholder value propositions; Step 3: Use tool to enumerate and analyze attack paths based on a comprehensive COTS vulnerability database containing 23,620 vulnerability information (the holes); Step 4: Evaluate the severity of each scenario in terms of numeric ratings against the evaluation criteria established in Step 2 (the size of the holes); Step 5: The security threat of each vulnerability is quantified with the total severity ratings of all attack paths that are relevant to this vulnerability; Step 6: System total threat is quantified with the total severity ratings of all attack paths; [Note] Step 3 to 6 are tool automated by the Tiramisu Tool T-MAP Framework * 。 Step 1-2: Evaluate Security against Criteria based on Stakeholder/Values Evaluate the severity of security hazard scenarios against stakeholder/value impacts Involves both qualitative and quantitative criteria Technical approach: Figure of Merits and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) A convenient tool to determine the priority of alternatives in terms of weight through pair-wise comparison Invented by Dr. Saaty at Business School of Univ. of Pennsylvania in 1970s [Saaty, 1980] Recommended by Dr. Bodin, Dr. Gordon et al for security investment evaluation [Bodin et al, 2005] T-MAP Framework * 。 Using AHP Determine the Weights – An Example Example (from USC ISD Server X Case Study) T-MAP Framework Value Centric Criteria Possible Breach Scenarios Weights derived through AHP pair-wise comparisons * 。 Step 3-4: Enumerate Attack Scenarios Enumerate the scenarios how an attacker can compromise stakeholder values through COTS system vulnerabilities Establish Structured Attack Graph based on a comprehensive COTS vulnerability database involves 23,620 known vulnerabilities reside in 31,713 COTS software T-MAP Framework * 。 Ste