论兴奋剂违规处理中的归责原则-法律（非法学）专业论文.docxVIP

观点。这种明确的划分，将使理论探讨的边界变得更为清晰。第四章 观点。这种明确的划分，将使理论探讨的边界变得更为清晰。第四章 首先说明了过错责任的含义及其在《世界反兴奋剂条例》中的体现。 由于《世界反兴奋剂条例》对证明所要达到的程度并无具体的要求， 因此，本章侧重案例分析，对证明时所要对待的“特殊情况进行展 示和梳理，希望以此为人们对该条例要求的把握提供有益的借鉴。 关键词：兴奋剂违规严格责任过错责任 万方数据 THE THE THEORY OF LIABILITY PRINCIPLES IN DoPINGⅥoLATIONS PROCESSING ABSTRACT Doping is the evils in competitive sport．In order to eliminate this kind of phenomenon，the world anti-doping agency has laid out an iron fist．On the major form of doping violations—positive doping tests on the handling of the strict liability applicable to the world anti—doping agency drew question，is considered¨too harsh¨．Meanwhile，the theoretical circle for its scope of application also have different opinions．In the face of people questioned about strict liability,the world anti—doping agency in the world anti-doping regulations increased in pemonal punishment phase of fault liability clause，to protect individual rights and interests for athletes to provide a s仃ong guarantee．Allowing athletes to defend,by the athletes party to prove their¨without fault or negligence¨and¨without a major fault or gross negligence¨，and according to the proof,in accordance with the proportion of corresponding responsibilities decided to athletes． This article has four parts．In the first chapter makes a brief review of the case，and put forward the issue of this case．The second Chapter made the definition of the concept for doping violations，and to determine III 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 the the doping violation and for doping violations，the difference between them were analyzed．The third chapter discusses the principle of strict liability in doping violations，and according to the regulation of the world anti—doping regulations and international sports arbitration court case，put forward that strict liability is applicable to confirm that violate the rules， in the penalty phase for fault liability．This clear demarcation，will make the boundary of the theory to explore more clear．The fourth chapter fwstly illustrates