论借记卡纠纷举证责任分配规则-法律专业论文.docxVIP

论借记卡纠纷举证责任分配规则-法律专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
AbstractIn Abstract In recent years,more people through the means of bankcard copy equipment, communication tools and network to commit crime in our society.Such crimes infiinge on interest bo也cardholders and issuers.The alloca缸on of the burden of proofis the key tO resolve the disputes. It can be beaer for cardholders and financial industry development if the judge has clear rules and uniform standards ofthe allocation ofthe burden ofproof. The research methods include empirical analysis methods,economic analysis method,comparative research methods,literature research methods and SO on. According with the existing judicial practice experience and the views of some scholars tO put forward some legislative proposals of the roles of allocation of the burden ofproof. In addition tO也e introduction the thesis divided into three parts. The first part is the judieial status.Firstly,the paper introduces the current situation and problems in the current legislation.Secondly,the paper describes the status ofjudicial practice.It is significant for issuer to take responsibility for liable for its fault,and then the paper analysis the effect of standard terms.There are some issues in recent cases about the allocation of the burden of proofl The second part is about jurisprudence and evaluation.In the first place,the legal relationship between cardholder and issuers are illustrated.Secondly,it discusses the issuer civil liability principles.Finally,the paper analyzes the distribution of the burden of proof of the theory to provide a theoretical basis. The third part generalizes the rules ofthe allocation ofthe burden ofproof.The rules in the United States,South Korea,EU,and Chinas Taiwan region are referenced.Some improvements are necessary.The issuer should prove cardholder’S fault.The cardholder should prove his lost.The issuer should prove the trading system’S security.The issuer also needs tO provide ATM video.At the same time, the cardholders as financial consumer need

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

peili2018 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档