- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
In 1985, the Coca-cola company made the decision to
change the formula of its leading soft drink. The change was
based on the findings of many market studies. These studies had
shown that the general response to the new product was good.
However, the change of the traditional Coca-cola by New Coke
was rejected by the majority of drinkers. In fact, the company
had to step back and restart production of the old formula of
Coca-cola.
The most important reason why New Coke was rejected
was the emotional relationship that existed between drinkers and
the old soft drink formula. Drinking Coca-cola had become a
tradition for many people over its 99 years of existence. The
change made by the company was not only in Coke’s formula
but also in the traditional values and memories that it represented
to the drinkers. “We had taken away more than the product
Coca-cola. We had taken away a little part of them and their
past.” The drinkers rejected this “improvement”, because “they
believed that Coke stood for traditional value.. so they betrayed
when the product changed completely overnight”.
Although a lot of research was done by Coca-cola company,
it didn’t show the depth of drinker’s emotion for the product. The
studies took many forms, but none of the tests was able to
measure the degree of personal and emotional reactions caused
by the disappearance of the old, traditional Coca-cola. The
weakness of the research was that it was mainly quantitative in
form. The result was only numbers that could not show the deep
meaning the product had for many people. A more extensive
study focusing on the qualitative
文档评论(0)