热能与动力工程论文外文文献及翻译.pdf

本科毕业论文 外文文献及译文 文献、资料题目：RenewableEnergy 文献、资料来源：期刊（著作、网络等） 文献、资料发表（出版）日期：2010.7.27 院 （部）： 热能工程学院 业： 热能与动力工程 班 级： 热动071 姓 名： 王明耀 学 号： 2007031189 指导教师： 杨冬 翻译日期： 2011.3.15 山东建筑大学毕业设计（或毕业论文，二选一）外文文献及译文 外文文献： Biomassco-firingoptionsontheemissionreductionan electricitygeneration costsincoal-fire powerplants Abstract Co-firing offers anear-term solution for reducing CO2 emissions from conventional fossil fuel power plants. Viable alternatives to long-term CO2 reduction technologies such as CO2 sequestration,oxy-firingan carbonloopcombustionarebeingdiscussed,butallofthemremain in the early to mi stages of development. Co-firing, on the other hand, is a well-proven technology an is in regular use though does not eliminate CO2 emissions entirely. An incremental gain in CO2 reduction can be achieve by immediate implementation of biomass co-firing in nearly all coal-fire power plants with minimum modifications an moderate investment,making co-firinganear-term solutionforthe greenhousegas emissionproblem. If a majority of coal-fire boilers operating aroun the worl adopt co-firing systems, the total reduction in CO2 emissions woul be substantial. It is the most efficient means of power generation from biomass, an it thus offers CO2 avoidance cost lower than that for CO2 sequestrationfromexistingpowerplants.Thepresentanalysisexaminesseveralco-firingoptions includinganovel optionexternal(indirect)firingusingcombustionorgasificationinanexisting coal or oil fire plant. Capital an operating costs of such external units are calculate to determine the return on investment. Two of these indirect co-firing options are analyze along with the option of direct co-firing of biomass inpulverizing mills to compare their operational meritsan costadvantageswiththegasificationoption. 1.Introduction The evidence of the e