民事诉讼和解研究.docVIP

PAGE 14 民事诉讼和解研究 摘 要 随着我国法制化进程的不断发展，越来越多的人更倾向于在法院解决纠纷，期待在法院得到公正且高效之判决，这也让法院的压力日益增加，法官的人数少，案件量的增多也导致法官工作量超负荷的问题时有发生。在此基础之上，民事诉讼和解制度作为比以往的审判更为便捷迅速的一种处理方式愈发被人们所重视。诉讼和解不同于诉讼外和解和法院调解，但在我国的民事诉讼法中，和解还未如调解一样，作为单独的制度存在。在目前我国的司法实践上，诉讼和解若要产生效力，必须经过撤诉或者提交法院制作调解书，这并不能达到很好利用诉讼和解制度解纷的目的。不同学说对于诉讼和解制度的定性各不相同，对其准确定性、研究其理论基础和与调解制度的深入对比，是讨论其要件、效力和瑕疵救济的前提。如何使和解制度能最大化地发挥其应有的效果是本文的研究目标，本文在分析其性质、理论基础和现状后，将提出完善我国民事诉讼和解制度的一些措施建议，以期为完善我国民事诉讼立法贡献一些参考意见。 关键词：民事诉讼和解；当事人合意；诉权；程序效力 Research of Reconciliation in Civil Action Abstract With the continuous development of the legalization process in our country, more and more people are more inclined to resolve disputes in the courts and expect fair and efficient judgments in the courts. This has also increased the pressure on the courts, the number of judges is small, and the number of cases The increase also caused the problem of overloading judges from time to time. On this basis, peoples attention has been paid more and more to the civil law settlement system as a more convenient and quicker method of handling than previous trials. Litigation settlement is different from out-of-litigation settlement and court mediation, but in Chinas civil procedure law, settlement has not yet existed as a separate system like mediation. In the current judicial practice in China, if the lawsuit reconciliation is to be effective, it must be withdrawn or submitted to the court to produce a mediation statement. This cannot achieve the purpose of making good use of the lawsuit reconciliation system to resolve disputes. Different doctrines have different qualitative characteristics of the litigation and reconciliation system, and its quasi-determinism, research of its theoretical basis, and in-depth comparison with the mediation system are the prerequisites for discussing its elements, effectiveness, and remedies for defects. How to make the reconciliation system maximize its due effect is the research goal of this article. After analyzing its nature, theoretical basi