对象认识错误处理规则解析 法学专业.doc

PAGE 2 对象认识错误处理规则解析 中文摘要 当前的法律理论研究界认为，错误对于确定刑事责任非常重要。我国的刑法研究学界虽然对于错误以至于认识错误进行了不同的研究，但是研究的角度和深度还不是非常细致和透彻。通过对我国刑事案件的梳理来看，有关事实认识错误的案件往往都是很难解决并且争议非常大的案件，因此，从日常司法实践中可以看出，事实认识错误，特别是对象知识的错误，不仅给审判人员带来了困扰，同时也是我国刑法学术界讨论的重要内容。根据我国刑法对于故意犯罪的定义，犯罪人对于自身的行为持有明知的故意，对于犯罪结果的发生持有放任的故意，因而构成故意犯罪。因此在认定犯罪人的行为是否是故意犯罪时，应当要必须要基于一致的主观和客观的关注。但是什么是主观，什么是客观却并没有具体明确的规定，因此学界对于此就会有许多不一致的意见，所以如果我们坚持用主客观一致的原则去解决刑法中的对象认识错误案件是不准确的。近年来，随着经济的不断发展与社会的不断进步，对象认识错误案件频发，案件的审理结果理所当然的会被民众所关注，甚至一些争议较大的案件还引起了人们的激烈讨论。因此，我们就必须要准确的去研究和讨论对象认识错误的问题，以至于能够在实际案件中更准确的进行定罪量刑。基于对以上内容的思考，本文由此产生。本文的主要任务是明确对象认识错误的概念并且需要弄清楚对象认识错误的不同类型和区分标准，以及对象认识错误的不同形态和对相应的量刑问题，最后从社会价值的角度出发,通过研究我国关于对象认识错误的立法现状，提出其存在的缺陷并提出相应的立法建议。 关键词：对象认识错误；法定符合说；抽象符合说；事实认识错误 Analysis?on?The?Rules?of?Object?Recognition?Error?Handling ABSTRACT The current legal theory research community believes that mistakes are very important for determining criminal responsibility. Although the criminal law research circle of our country has carried out different researches on mistakes and misunderstandings, the angle and depth of the research are not very detailed and thorough. From the review of criminal cases in our country, the cases of wrong understanding of facts are often difficult to resolve and very controversial cases. Therefore, it can be seen from daily judicial practice that facts are wrong, especially the wrong knowledge of the object. Is the focus and difficulty of studying criminal law theory. Article 14 of my country’s "Criminal Law" stipulates: Knowing that one's own actions will cause harm to society, and hoping or allowing the results to happen, and thus constitute a crime, it is an intentional crime. This highlights our consistent subjective and objective concerns about whether deliberate crimes must be based on. However, there is no specific and clear stipulation on what is subjective and objective. Therefore, the academic community will have many inconsistent opinions on this. Therefore, if we insist on using the principle of subjective and obj