- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
案例研究专题(期中大作业);2-2;;4;5;2-6;第二部分;Deductive Research Model;因果关系的标准;变量类型与关系模型;学习目标;案例研究介绍;Case Study Research;其他定义;Usefulness of Case Studies;Criticisms of the Method;;Key Components;案例研究设计五要素;分析单元特别说明;Campbell模式对比的例子;理论发展;从案例研究推论至理论;两个推论的层级;案例研究设计示例;案例研究的设计类型;Single Case Design;选择单一案例的原因;类型一/二:单一整体性/嵌入式案例;单一案例设计易犯之错误;Multiple Case Design;Multiple Case Design;选择多重案例的优缺点;Analyzing within field and cross case data: ;多重案例的复现逻辑;多重案例复现逻辑示例;多重案例的复现逻辑;Examine not just one process story, but allowing theoretical ideas to be tested and deepened in different settings:
Klarner and Raisch (2013) obtain their data from annual corporate reports of 67 European insurance companies between 1995 and 2004. They code these data into six different temporal patterns of change using an innovative multiple sequence alignment method derived from the biological sciences and then show how regularity in ongoing organizational changes is associated with performance using statistical methods.
Bresman (2013) uses an interesting embedded multiple case design, focusing on two units in a pharmaceutical company, and examining learning transferred among four successive projects occurring in each unit (for a total of eight units of analysis). His inductively derived four-phase process model of vicarious learning is replicated across all his cases.
Bruns (2013) replicates her model of collaborative research in two different settings involving multiple groups.
Maguire and Hardy (2013) also compare two different cases of risk assessment processes, showing how both incorporated similar bundles of normalizing and problematizing practices, but how the differential ordering of these practices led to different consequences for the construction of risk.
;类型三/四 :多重整体性/嵌入式案例;;案例研究的程序;Conducting Case Studies 1;Conducting Case Studies 2;Case Study Protocol;Pilot Case Study;六种证据来源;收敛的多重证据来源;Documents, Archives Artifacts;Interviews;Direct Observations;Principles of Data Collection 1;Principles of Data Collection 2;Pr
原创力文档


文档评论(0)