关于噪声污染侵权认定的案例研究.docVIP

PAGE 20 年 月 日 导师签名： 20 年 月 日 关于噪声污染侵权认定的案例研究 摘要：随着中国经济发展，人们对物质生活的需要得到满足，人民也更加注重对精神权利的需要，在诉讼领域中噪声污染侵权的数量日渐增加，司法和理论领域对噪声污染侵权诉讼的关注度也越来越高，原告的诉讼请求很难得到法院支持，法律的相关不足之处也就渐渐显现出来。我国法律对环境污染诉讼案件中的低频噪声侵权、稍微超出限值的噪声侵权责任的认定、精神损害赔偿以及偶发性噪声侵权等方面的规定，可操作性低、缺乏理论指导实践。 本文围绕谢冠亚诉武汉龙阳置业公司噪声污染责任纠纷的案例展开研究，主要分析了低频噪声污染侵权的认定和界定标准、稍微超出限值的低频噪声污染精神损害赔偿、偶发性噪声侵权的责任承担。除引言外，本文主要分三个模块分析讨论了环境噪声侵权造成的精神损害赔偿：第一模块是从谢冠亚诉武汉龙阳置业公司噪声污染责任纠纷的案例为切入点，阐述了基本案情，从案例中，引出了两个法律争议问题和一个拓展思考问题。第二模块是案例引发思考的法律争议问题具体分析，从多个角度分析。第三模块是通过对案例问题的研究和分析，结合我国现状，提出一些具有创新意义，完善我国噪声污染侵权法律制度、维护人民利益的建议。 关键词：噪声污染侵权认定， 精神损害赔偿，偶发性噪声，法律完善 A Case Study on the Determination of Noise Pollution Infringement Abstract： With the development of Chinas economy, peoples needs for material life have been met, and people have paid more attention to the need for spiritual rights. The number of noise pollution infringements in the litigation field is increasing day by day. With the higher and higher, the plaintiff ’s lawsuit request is difficult to get the support of the court, and the relevant deficiencies of the law gradually emerge. Chinas laws on low-frequency noise infringement in environmental pollution litigation, the determination of noise tort liability slightly exceeding the limit, compensation for mental damage, and incidental noise infringement have low operability and lack of theoretical guidance and practice. This article focuses on the case of Xie Guanya . Wuhan Longyang Real Estate Co., Ltd. in the case of noise pollution liability disputes, and mainly analyzes the identification and definition standards of low-frequency noise pollution infringement, compensation for mental damage of low-frequency noise pollution slightly exceeding the limit, and responsibility for incidental noise tort . In addition to the introduction, this article mainly analyzes and discusses the mental damage compensation caused by environmental noise infringement in three modules: The first module is based on the case of Xie Guanya . Wuhan Longyang Real Es