- 1、本文档共23页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
——part two China’s economy: not just another fake The worlds capital The worlds capital China’s second apparent point of similarity to Japan is overinvestment. Total fixed investment jumped to an estimated 47% of GDP last year—ten points more than in Japan at its peak. Chinese investment is certainly high: in most developed countries it accounts for around 20% of GDP. 中国同日本的另一个明显的相同点是过度投资。去年,总的固定投资额占GDP 的比例跃升到将近47%-这比日本峰值的水平还高10个百分点。中国的投资肯定是太高了:在大多数发达国家固定投资占GDP的比例大约在20%左右。 But you cannot infer waste from a high investment ratio alone. It is hard to argue that China has added too much to its capital stock when, per person, it has only about 5% of what America or Japan has. China does have excess capacity in some industries, such as steel and cement. But across the economy as a whole, concerns about overinvestment tend to be exaggerated. 但是单单就凭一个较高的投资比例,你不能断定投资存在浪费现象。在中国的人均资本还只是日美人均资本量的大约5%的情况下,很难下定论说中国资本存量过剩。中国在一些行业确实存在过剩的资本,诸如钢铁、水泥行业。但是纵观中国经济全局,过度投资的担忧似乎有些被夸大了。 Pivot Capital Management points to China’s incremental capital-output ratio (ICOR), which is calculated as annual investment divided by the annual increase in GDP, as evidence of the collapsing efficiency of investment. Pivot argues that in 2009 China’s ICOR was more than double its average in the 1980s and 1990s, implying that it required much more investment to generate an additional unit of output. Pivot资本管理公司用增量资本产出比例(简称ICOR)作为中国投资效率的下滑的有力证明,ICOR的计算方法是用年度投资增量除以年度GDP增量。Pivot称2009年中国的增量资本产出比例是20世纪80,90年代的平均水平的两倍还要多,意味着额外产出需要耗费更多的资本。 However, it is misleading to look at the ICOR for a single year. With slower GDP growth, because of a collapse in global demand, the ICOR rose sharply everywhere. The return to investment in terms of growth over a longer period is more informative. Measuring this way, BCA Research finds no significant increase in China’s ICOR over the past three decades. 然而,单看某一年的ICOR会具有误导性。在全球需求低迷导致的GDP增长缓慢的大环境下,世界各地的增量资本产出比例都在急剧上涨。从长期增长的角度来看资本回报率更有意义。从这个角度看,BCA研究公司发现中国的增量资本产出比例在过去
文档评论(0)