比较微创拔牙与常规拔牙在阻生智齿拔除术中的效果（临床医学论文资料）.docVIP

比较微创拔牙与常规拔牙在阻生智齿拔除术中的效果（临床医学论文资料） 文档信息 ： 文档作为关于“医学心理学”中“口腔科学”的参考范文，为解决如何写好实用应用文、正确编写文案格式、内容素材摘取等相关工作提供支持。正文5516字，doc格式，可编辑。质优实惠，欢迎下载！ 目录 TOC \o "1-9" \h \z \u 目录 1 正文 1 文1：比较微创拔牙与常规拔牙在阻生智齿拔除术中的效果 1 1 资料与方法 3 2 结果 5 3 讨论 8 文2：缝合与否对下颌水平埋伏阻生智齿拔牙创口愈合效果的影响 9 1资料与方法 9 2结果（表1，表2） 10 参考文摘引言： 11 原创性声明（模板） 12 正文 比较微创拔牙与常规拔牙在阻生智齿拔除术中的效果（临床医学论文资料） 文1：比较微创拔牙与常规拔牙在阻生智齿拔除术中的效果 To compare the effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction and conventional tooth extraction in extraction of impacted wisdom teeth [abstract] : objective to compare the effect of minimally invasive tooth extraction and conventional tooth extraction in the extraction of impacted wisdom teeth.Selection methods from April 2017 to August 2018 were need to pull out impacted wisdom teeth of 84 cases of patients， randomly pided into minimally invasive group and routine group， 42 cases in each group， conventional group were treated by routine exodontia， minimally invasive group were treated by minimally invasive exodontia and comparison of two groups of patients with operation time， VAS， increased rate， postoperative facial swelling ratio and tooth socket complete ratio， evaluation of two groups of patients' satisfaction.Results the operation time， VAS， root-breaking rate and postoperative facial swelling rate in the minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those in the control group， and the tooth extraction fossa integrity rate was significantly higher than that in the control group， with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The satisfaction of patients in the minimally invasive group was 95.24%， significantly higher than that in the control group (78.57%)， with statistically significant difference (P<0.05).Conclusion compared with conventional tooth extraction surgery， minimally invasive tooth extraction surgery can significantly reduce the injury of patients with impacted wisdom tooth extraction， and the tooth extraction effect is significant， with high