- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
指南解读:血流动力学监测与心脏超声(CUS)
SLAX: 肋下长轴切面SIVC: 肋下下腔静脉切面PLAX:胸骨旁长轴切面PSAX: 胸骨旁短轴切面A4CH: 心尖四腔心切面CUS最常用的五个切面
Antonelli M, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(4):575-90.Cecconi M, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-815. 25位专家组成的团队12位专家组成的团队
Five Specific Questions(1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock?
2014 ConsensusRecommended against常规使用: (1) the pulmonary artery catheter in shock 休克患者使用肺动脉导管(2) static preload measurements used alone to predict fluid responsiveness 仅仅使用静态的前负荷测量方法来预测液体反应性
Main differences
Blood pressure statementsICM 2007ICM 2014
Fluid responsiveness statementsICM 2007ICM 2014
ICM 2007
Hemodynamic monitoringICM 2014
Cecconi M, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-815.
Main new statements(1) Statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) Statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) Statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring.
2014 ConsensusIdentification of the type of shock? We recommend further hemodynamic assessment (such as assessing cardiac function) to determine the type of shock if the clinical examination does not lead to a clear diagnosis. Best practiceWe suggest that, when hemodynamic assessment is needed, echocardiography is the preferred modality to initially evaluate the type of shock as opposed to more invasive technologies. Recommendation. Level 2; QoE (B)
Rationale:Context analysis (trauma, infection, chest pain, etc.) and clinical evaluation which focuses on skin perfusion and jugular vein distension usually orient diagnosis to the type of shock
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 植保无人机飞行作业服务设备维护及调试方案.doc VIP
- 海迪克新材料科技有限公司年产聚-3,4-乙烯二氧噻(PEDOT)精品 47.7 吨新建项目环评报告表.docx VIP
- 2025年西师版三年级上册数学全册教案(完整) .pdf VIP
- 急救技能—心肺复苏(2024版).pptx VIP
- T_ZNZ 094—2024(滨海盐碱地生物改良技术规范).pdf VIP
- 数学北师大课标版八年级上册综合与实践 创新作业设计模板.docx VIP
- 甲状腺危象病人的护理.pptx VIP
- 2021年咸阳经开城市发展集团有限公司招聘试题及答案解析.docx VIP
- 2024年人教版七年级英语上册单词 .pdf VIP
- 化工总控工培训.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)