刚果案中限制豁免原则及中国国家豁免理论问题研究.pdfVIP

暨南大学硕士论文 刚果案中限制豁免原则及中国国家豁免理论问题研究 摘 要 基于古老国际法原则—“平等者之间无统治权”而形成的国家豁免原则，是国际社会 公认的一项原则。该原则在早期被认为是绝对地排他地，即绝对豁免。但是，第二次世界 大战之后，随着现代国家参与国际经济活动的频繁，从各国立法和司法实践以及国际公约 来看，国家豁免出现了向限制豁免发展的趋势，即对于国家的某些行为不予豁免。本文以 美国对冲基金在香港诉刚果民主共和国及中铁公司等案件为中心，就本案中香港是否对此 案有管辖权、香港在回归之后国家豁免的立场以及香港在立场上是否要跟从中国政府的意 见等问题展开，对于“一国两制”下国家豁免存在的问题，如香港在回归之后在国家豁免 上不能继续适用普通法、在“一国两制”之下要实现香港与内地立场上的统一等问题进行 了独立的分析。最后结合当今国际社会国家豁免的发展趋势，借鉴发达资本主义国家和国 际公约的经验，提出我国国家豁免的发展方向和建议。 关键词：国家豁免 绝对豁免 限制豁免 I 暨南大学硕士论文 刚果案中限制豁免原则及中国国家豁免理论问题研究 Abstract The principles of national immunity, based on the ancient principles of international law – “par in param non habet imperium”, is a principle recognized by the international community. This principle is absolute and exclusive in the early days, that is to say, this principle is absolutely immunity. After the second world war, the nation immunity appeared the tendency which developed to the limited immunity, namely the country didn’t exempt some behavior from countries legislation and judicial practice, the international convention to see. This paper analyses the focus of controversy of the case which is about the state immunity position of Hong Kong, whether Hong Kong have jurisdiction in the case of state immunity and whether Hong Kong should follow the Chinese government views on the position, with analyzing the American hedge funds prosecute the case of democratic republic of Congo and China Railway Group Limited in Hong Kong as the introduction. This paper analyses the problem of the nation immunity in the condition of “one country, two systems”: Hong Kong cant continue to apply the nation immunity in the common