论所有权的自由与限制.pdfVIP

， ·。 ·。 ·。 · 经济探索 INNOVATIONNo．4Aug．2008。一·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·。·· ◇ 一日 一二oo八年 第四期 O ’ 0 论所有权的自由与限制 郭嗣彦 (广州番禺职业技术学院讲师、武汉大学法学院博士研究生，广东 广州 511483) 摘【 要] 所有权对于公民的财产权利甚至整个法权具有重要意义。近代民法一直强调所有权行使的绝对 自由，忽略 了所有权 应该受到的社会公益限制，其结果是使 自由走向了反面。为克服所有权绝对 自由带来的负面影响，现代民法开始由权利本位转向社 会本位，逐步形成了所有权的社会化思潮，强调所有权的行使应该以尊重和维护社会公益为前提。但是由于社会公益的概念比较宽 泛，范围难以确定，为了防止有人以公益之名谋私益之实，应该对社会公共利益的界定确立实体标准和程序标准，以解决因社会公 共利益的界定产生的争议，寻求社会公益与个人私益的平衡，维护公民个人的实体权利。 关【键词] 所有权；权利本位；公共利益；私人利益 [中图分类号] Dr521 [文献标识码】 A [文章编号】 1673—8616(2008)04—0094—04 Study on Freedom and Limitation ofProprietary Rights GUO Si—yan Abstract：Proprietary 一 SI is very impo~antto citizen’sproperty ownership and eyed to thewholelaw righIs．Contemporary civillaw hasbeen emphasizingthe absolute freedom in the performance ofprbprietaryrightsand neglectingthefactthatproprietary rights should be limited by socialpublic interests．The resultofwhich isleading freedom to the opposite direction．In orderto overcome the negative effects broughtby absolute freedom in proprietary fights，Cllrrentcivillaw has turned its direction from fight—orientation to s0ciety—orientati0n，and graduallychanged intosocialization ofproprietary rights，which hasemphasized theprior- of respectand protection in the carrying outofproprietary rights．Because the conceptof socialpublic interestis relatively broad，the definition ishard to ￡x．In order topreventpeoplefrom doing thingsfortheirownbenefits，itisneeessalry to setup entity and procedure standardsforthe definition ofsocialpublic interestin orderto scale the disputesin the definition ofsocial publicinterests．Itcan help realizethe balancebetween socialpublic inter