公共交通补贴激励机制研究.pdf

Abstract a of infrastructure，not Citypublictransportation，aspart citypublic only the alSOrelatedtothevitalinterestsof residents． promotescity’Sdevelopment，but city withothertraffic has suchas modes．urbantransit Compare public advantageslarge ofthedomestic capacity,highefficiency,lesspollution，safety．Atpresent，most public hasserious hasthe inrecent enterprises losses，evenincreasingtendency years，it hinderedthe of transit．Inordertomaintainthe seriously healthydevelopmentcitypublic normal of andlocal hadtoafford operationcitypublictransportation，stategovernments themassive nodoubtto tremendousfinancial tothe subsidies，it brought pressure thesame informationandincentiveconstraints government．Attime，asymmetric inthe of in subsidiesresultextensive the problemsprocess of onthe onhow a possibilityenterprises’dependence subsidy．Researchdevelop subsidiesto andsocial systemimproveoperationefficiency,hasimportantpractical torealizethebus significance prioritydevelopmentstrategies． Inviewof above ofthe bus problems，thispaperanalysisexistingtypicalcity usesthe ofcost-benefitand todiscussthe subsidies，andtheory