基于计算流体力学的两种控流筛管控件性能对比分析.docVIP

控流筛管内流动特性的数值研究* 孙浩玉[1] 李增亮[2] 魏新芳[1] 余金陵[1] 徐鑫[1] [1]（胜利石油管理局钻井工艺研究院，山东东营，257000） [2] 中国石油大学（华东）机电工程学院 摘要：控流筛管可通过控制油井部分井段产出液流量来实现水平段同时出水，而控流控件是其核心部件。本文以计算流体动力学为基础，分别对导流式控件和迷宫式控件流道内流体的流动特征进行了数值模拟，并对两种控件的适用范围进行了对比分析。数值计算结果表明，两种控件由流道入口到出口，流道压力均呈线性降低；导流式控件流道中的流动近似呈平推流，涡流和湍动不显著；低粘度条件下，迷宫式控件流道内存在明显的一次、二次涡流，过流阻力显著增加，控流效果显著。对比分析发现，过流流体粘度介于25~1000 mPa?s时，导流式控件的性能较优；其他粘度范围内，迷宫式控件的性能较优。 关键词：控流筛管; 计算流体力学; 流动特性; 过流压降; 粘度 Performance comparison of two inflow control devices based on computational fluid dynamics SUN Haoyu[1] Li Zengliang[2] WEI Xinfang[1] YU Jinling[1] XU Xin[1] [1] (Drilling technology research institute of Shengli Petroleum Administration Bureau, Dongying, Shandong, 257000) [2] College of Mechanical Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Ease China) Abstract: Inflow control device could efficiently get inflow through evenly water production in lateral, and control unit is core component of the tool. Flow characteristics of helical-flow-channel and labyrinth-flow-channel controllers were simulated based on computational fluid dynamics, and scope comparative analysis of the two controllers was carried out. The numerical results show that, from channel inlet to the outlet , channel pressure showed linear decreases of the two controllers. Flow path is approximated plug flow in helical-flow-channel, swirl and turbulence was not significant. There is distinct primary and secondary vortex in labyrinth-flow-channel under conditions of low viscosity, which results to large pressure drop. Comparative analysis show that, helical-flow-channel controller has better preferment when viscosities ranging from 25~1000 mPa ? s, while abyrinth-flow-channel controller has better preferment in other viscosity range. Key Words: Inflow control device; computational fluid dynamics; flow characteristics; flow pressure drop;viscosity 1 引言 水平井筛管分段完井技术是近几年发展起来的完井技术。这种技术对穿越油藏的水平段按照地质、油藏特征及工程需要在完井阶段进行科学分段，为油气井的后期处理建立了基础条件。油气井投产后随着生产的进行出现了边底水锥进问题，表现为局部见水后采出液含水率上升迅速，部分油井含水甚至上