(每日一读)2014年2月高考英语考前突破 阅读理解能力 社会生活 印度法官婚前性行为违反宗教教义.docVIP

(每日一读)2014年2月高考英语考前突破 阅读理解能力 社会生活 印度法官婚前性行为违反宗教教义.doc

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
印度法官:婚前性行为违反宗教教义 A court in the Indian capital, Delhi, has said that pre-marital sex was immoral and against the tenets of every religion. 在印度首都新德里,一名法官在裁决一起诉讼时说,婚前性行为是“不道德”的,也违反每一种宗教的教义。 ? Judge Virender Bhat made the remarks after ruling that sex between two adults on the promise of marriage did not amount to rape. ? Pre-marital sex remains a cultural taboo in India. ? Last year, a court in Delhi said live-in relationships were immoral and an infamous product of Western culture. ? Judge Bhat presides over a fast-track court set up in the Indian capital to dispose of cases relating to sexual offences against women. ? He made his latest remarks while clearing a man employed with a multinational company accused of rape by a woman. ? The 29-year-old man was arrested after the woman working in a different company lodged a complaint of rape against him in 2011. ? The woman alleged that the man had sex with her after promising marriage. ? In my opinion, every act of sexual intercourse between two adults on the assurance of promise of marriage does not become rape, if the assurance or promise is not fulfilled later on by the boy, Judge Bhat was quoted as saying by the Press Trust of India. ? When a grown up, educated and office-going woman subjects herself to sexual intercourse with a friend or colleague on the latters promise that he would marry her, she does so at her own peril. She must be taken to understand the consequences of her act and must know that there is no guarantee that the boy would fulfil his promise. ? He may or may not do so. She must understand that she is engaging in an act which not only is immoral but also against the tenets of every religion. No religion in the world allows pre-marital sex, the judge added. ? In 2010, the Supreme Court dismissed a number of cases against a Tamil actress who spoke in support of the right of women to have pre-marital sex. The court also endorsed the right of unmarried couples to live together. ? Actress Kushboo was a

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

gubeiren_001 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档