不应被忽视权利——被害人诉讼权利问题研究.pdfVIP

摘 要 我国的刑事诉讼法确立了被害人的当事人地位，从法律意义来上说被害人 就应该享有完整的诉讼权利，在诉讼中拥有能够影响诉讼进程和包括起诉权、 上诉权、申诉权在内的基本权利。但事实上，刑事诉讼法本身没有赋予被害人 完整的诉讼权利，在实际操作过程中，被害人诉讼权利被漠视的现象也比比皆 是，另外最高人民法院所作的限制性解释也直接影响到被害人诉讼权利的实现。 本文在对照分析国内外被害人诉讼权利保护现状的基础上，指出我国对被害人 诉讼权利的保护存在法律上的缺陷，提出应该扩大现有刑事附带民事诉讼的受 案范围，赋予被害人以完整意义的上诉权，确保被害人各项诉讼权利的充分实 现。 关键词： 刑事被害人；诉讼权利；制度保护 I ABSTRACT China’s Criminal Procedural Law established the status of the victims as the parties. From the view of law, the victim should have complete lawsuit rights, which can influence the process of litigation, including the basic rights to sue, to appeal, and the right of pleas. In fact, criminal Procedure law itself have not give complete lawsuit rights to victims, in criminal action, the litigation rights of victims are ignored constantly, in addition, the restrictive interpretation made by the Supreme People’s Court also prevent directly victims from exercising their litigation rights. In basic of comparative study on guarantee of litigation rights of victims between china and foreign, this paper points out legal flaws for protection of the litigation rights of victims to in our country, raise that should expand the range of existing criminal fringe civil case, and express that should give victims the right to appeal in full meaning for ensure all the litigation rights of victims to the full realization. Keywords: Criminal Victims Litigation rights Protection system II 湘潭大学 学位论文原创性声明 本人郑重声明：所呈交的论文是本人在导师的指导下独立进行研究所取得的 研究成果。除了文中特别加以标注引用的内容外，本论文不包含任何其他个人或 集体已经发表或撰写的成果作品。对本文的研究做出重要贡献的个人和集体，均 已在文中以明确方式标明。本人完全意识到本声明的法律后果