GC_MS和GC_FID在定量分析中的差异_范国梁.pdfVIP

36 　5 　　　　　 Vol.36　No.5 　 20039 Journal of TianjinUniversity Sep.2003 　 GC-MSGC-FID 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 范国梁, 宋崇林, 张延峰, 周维义, 阎　颖, 王　静, 姜东峰 (1., 300072;2., 300072;) 　:对气相色谱-质谱联机的四极质量检测器(GC-MS)和气相色谱的氢火焰离子化检测器(GC-FID)在定量方面 的差异性进行 比较和研究.实验表明在通常的分析条件下, 当不使用定量校正因子时, 两种检测器的定量结果相 差非常大.其主要原因不仅是两种质量检测器的离子化方法不同, 更重要的是四极质量检测器操作条件的微小变 化会严重改变其检测灵敏度的大小, 使定量的精度变差.研究发现, 在 一定条件下四极质量检测器也可以像 FID 检 测器一样, 在不使用校正因子的情况下获得准确的定量结果. :;; :O657.63　　　:A　　　:0493-2137(2003)05-0614-04 Difference of Quantity Analysis with Quadrupole Mass Detector and Fla eIonization Detector in Gas Chro atography 1 2 2 1 FAN Guo-liang , SONG Chong-lin , Z ANG Yan-feng , Z OU Wei-yi , 1 1 1 YAN Ying , WANG Jing , JIANG Dong-feng (1.Analysis Center, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Engine Combustion, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China) Abstract:The quantity analyses were compared with quadrupole mass detector and flame ionization detector in gas chromatography-mass spectrometer andgas chromatography.The resultswere quite differentwhen the calibrationfac- tor was not used in analysis under common condition.The reason of causing these resultswas discussed.The condi- tion of obtaining exact resultwithoutusing calibration factor was described ingas chromatography-mass spectrometer. Keywords:quadrupole mass detector;flame ionization detector;quantity analysis 　　-(Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrom- , GC-MS , eter, GC-MS) , FID , , (Flame Ion