法律与道德_分离后的结合_重温哈特与富勒的论战对我国法治的启示.pdfVIP

法律与道德_分离后的结合_重温哈特与富勒的论战对我国法治的启示.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
37 1 ( ) Vol. 37, No. 1 2007 1 Journal of Zhejiang University(Humanities and Social Sciences) J an. 2007 法律与道德: 分离后的结合 ) ) ) 重温哈特与富勒的论战对我国法治的启示 孙笑侠, 麻 鸣 ( , 310028) [ ] 20 , , / 0 , , , , / 0 : , ; , [ ] ; ; ; ; [ ] D90- 053 [ ] A [ ] 1008- 942X( 2007) 0 1- 0 144- 09 Law and Morality: Connection after eing Separated SU N Xiao-x ia, M A M ing ( D ep ar tme nt of L aw , Zhej i ang Un iv e rs i ty , H angz hou 310028, Ch ina) Abstract: In th last c ntury th r occurr d a famous d bat b tw n H . L. A. Hart and Lon L. Full r ov r th r lationship of law and morality, w hich has b n s n as th histor ic confrontation b tw n l gal positivists and natural law think rs. A s th d bat nd d, it is usually d lin at d that th l gal positivists insist on th s par ation of law and morality and th natural law think rs insist on th un-s paration of law and morality. This is almost th s ttl d conclusion about th d bat . Such a blank t conclusion, how v r, should hav conc al d th d bat rs d p aw ar n ss of jurisprud nt probl ms and its pr ofound significanc in l gal practic . In th d bat , Hart d finit ly d f nd d th l gal positivism against cr iticisms w hich app ar d at his tim and r it rat d a strict s paration of law and morality . Th s paration th sis w hich is typically formulat d in t rms of dth s par ation of law as it is and law as it ought to b d, accor ding to Hart s xplication, m ans tw o simpl things: first, in th abs nc of an xpr ss d constitutional or l gal pr ovision, it could not follow from th m r fact that a rul violat d standards of morality that it w as not a rul ; s cond, it could no

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

文档精品 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6203200221000001

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档