二语习得(L3)正.ppt

Lesson Three Interlanguage and the ‘natural’ route of development Tasks: 1 writing a paper on the topic on the ‘natural’ route of development of L2 2 writing a paper on the topic success analysis instead of error analysis 3 writing a paper on the topic An analysis of English fossilization of student at some level 1. What are mentalist views of L1 acquisition? 2. What are the assumptions underlying interlanguage theory? 3. What are the principal processes operated in interlanguage? 4. What is fossilization? Why? 5. What are the essential Characteristics of Language-learner language? 6. What are the differences between Error analysis and Contrastive Analysis? 7. What information about interlanguage does Error Analysis provide? 8.What are the empirical evidences for the interlanguage hypothesis? 9. What are the problems with the empirical researches? Introduction Background theory and research in L1 acquisition (a fixed order are based on a theory of learning that stresses the learner-internal factors ) The notion of interlanguage (theoretical construct used to identify the stages of development ) ‘natural’ route of development (The principal goal of this chapter ) Discussion of the L2=L1 hypotesis Caveats ( regarding the centrality of learner-internal processes in accounts of SLA) Mentalist accounts of first language acquisition Chomsky Lenneberg McNeill Language acquisition device Chomsky assumes that children are born with a language acquisition device( LAD). This LAD is made up of a set of general principles called universal grammar. These general principles can be applied to all the languages in the world. Definition of acquisition Acquisition can be broadly defined as the internalization of rules and formulas which are then used to communicate in the L2. In this sense the term ‘acquisition’ is synonymous with the term ‘learning’. However, Krashen (1981) uses these terms with different meaning. ‘Acquisition’ for Krashen, consist