两种宽体客机总体参数优化对比分析.pdfVIP

2013 年首届中国航空科学技术大会论文集 Beijing, sept.25, 2013 ISBN 978-7-89463-135- 两种宽体客机总体参数优化与对比分析 王佳杰 张超然 余雄庆 南京航空航天大学 飞行器先进设计技术国防重点学科实验室，江苏 南京 210016 摘 要：应用优化方法分别确定中短程宽体客机与远程宽体客机的总体参数，定量对比分析这两种客机在尺寸、重 量、发动机需用推力、油耗和运营成本方面的差异。研究结果表明，中短程宽体客机的机翼面积、使用空重、发动 机最大推力分别只有远程宽体客机的52%、61%和44% 。当轮挡航程为4500km时，中短程型客机的耗油量和座公里成 本分别为远程型宽体客机的62%和52%。当轮挡航程为1200km时，中短程型客机的耗油量和座公里成本分别为远程型 宽体客机的72%和45% 。 关键词：宽体客机；总体设计；优化；油耗；直接运营成本 中图分类号：V221.6 文献标识码：A Conceptual Design Optimizations and Comparisons for Two Kinds of Wide-Body Airliners WANG Jiajie ZHANG Chaoran YU Xiongqing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China Abstract: The optimization method is used to determine the primary parameters for two jet airliners –one is a short/medium range airliner and another is a long range airliner. The differences of the size, mass, engine thrust, fuel consumption and direct operating costs (DOC) between the two airliners are investigated quantitatively. The results after optimization indicate that the wing area, operational empty mass and engine thrust required of the short/medium range airliner are 52%, 61% and 44% of that of the long range airliner, respectively. When the flight range is 4500km, the fuel consumption and DOC of the short/medium range airliner are 62% and 52% of that of the long range airliner, respectively. When the flight range is 1200km, the fuel consumption and DOC of the short/medium range airliner are 72% and 45% of that of the long range airliner, respectively. Key