先秦儒墨哲学思想比较分析.pdfVIP

2005 年第6 期 No6, 2005 ( 总第194 期) THE NORTHERN FORUM Total No194 先秦儒墨哲学思想比较分析 张景云 ( , 100037) [[ ]] 儒儒家家与与墨墨家家有有相相近近的的学学术术渊渊源源,, 却却导导致致不不同同的的学学术术方方向向墨墨家家对对儒儒家家曾曾提提出出四四点点批批评评,, 学学术术 界界 般般将将此此作作为为儒儒墨墨分分野野的的主主要要依依据据笔笔者者从从儒儒墨墨两两家家对对 仁仁 的的理理解解对对 礼礼 的的态态度度和和政政治治思思想想方方面面 剖剖析析其其异异同同之之处处认认为为,, 在在对对 仁仁 的的理理解解上上,, 儒儒墨墨两两家家从从基基本本理理念念和和表表现现形形式式根根源源及及其其实实现现方方式式宗宗 旨旨及及其其实实现现途途径径等等方方面面体体现现出出不不同同的的取取向向;; 儒儒墨墨两两家家对对祭祭祀祀的的态态度度和和对对 鬼鬼神神 的的看看法法体体现现了了他他们们在在 礼礼 的问题上的主要分歧; 从国家的起源和政治制度的运作的剖析中, 可以窥见两家政治思想的异同 [ ] 先秦儒墨; 哲学思想; 比较分析 [ ] B222- 224 [ ] A [ ] 1000- 3541 (2005) 06- 0123- 03 Comparatively analyzing philosophy thoughts of Confucians vs. Mohist in the early Qin Dynasty ZHANG Jing- yun ( Business Sc ool, Beijing Tec uology and Business University, Beijing 100037, C ina) Abstract: Alt oug Confucians Sc ool andMo ist Sc ool s are almost t e same academic origin, t ey ave different academic perspec- tives. Mo ist advanced four criticisms toward Confucians, w ic is regarded as main bases distinguis ing t e two. T e paper probes t e same and t e different of t e two from t ree aspects: t e perception to Ren, t e attitude to Li and politic t oug ts. T e aut or olds t at on t e perception to Ren, t e two sc ools ave different view from basic mind and t e form of it, origin and its realizationway, goals and its realiza- tion. On Li, t e main differentiates are t e attitude to sacredness and g ost. From origin of nation and t e way of t e political system going, t e paper reveals t e same and differentiates of t e two sc ools on politic t oug ts. Key words: Confucians vs. Mo ist in t e early Qin Dynasty; p ilosop y t oug t; comparative analysis ,