英语品牌策划案.pptVIP

Case 8 Team members 刘 丹 200906303116 崔思雨 200906303108 陈娅莉 200906303117 马盼盼 200906303209 黄春娟 200906303216 The introduce of the case ethical and social issues in information systems A look at how monitoring patterns of behavior online can be construed as subversive behavior, and how errors in interpreting the results can lead the innocent to jail. This case discusses both the positive and negative results of new advances in technology. The positive is we can use the high technology to track the information of the criminals, and the negative is that the terrorists can commit crimes by using this. Topics Topic 1 It’s unclear if this project infringes on freedom of speech and individual privacy. On the one hand, detection of potential terrorist is an important method of deterring future terrorist attacks. On the other hand, individuals who haven’t done or said anything wrong may be profiled and have their private conversations exposed. An additional concern is how to distinguish what kinds of speech are grounds for surveillance. Topic 2 Yes, they were. On one hand, Holm’s behavior was illegal and not protected by the law anymore, and it had done harm to the society and other people. On the other hand, everyone even the whole society is responsible for the anti-terrorism, at the same time, they were entitled the rights to deal with the illegal behavior. If the terrorists can use the technology and internet to do something dangerous to our society , why don’t we put it on them with the same way. This is related to a question of whether this kind of behavior is legal or not, or whether it harms people’s privacy. As we said above ,if this kind of behavior itself is illegal, of course we can keep watch on them through the technology. Even if this behavior is not ethical to some degree, but if the criminals are not arrested, the society may suffer a great disaster. so totally speaking, it’s reasonable. Topic 3 In China, the input method