我国检察机关刑事审判监督制度困境对策.pdfVIP

摘 要 摘 要 在我国宪法中，检察机关被规定为法律监督机关。从当前我国的司法实践来看，在 刑事审判监督制度上，检察机关面临着诸多困境。一方面，这一制度本身存在一定不足， 例如监督的时间规定的不合理使得监督效力难以发挥，监督的方式不具体使得监督流于 形式等，很多这样的问题看似较为细节但实际上却影响了整个刑事审判监督制度能否发 挥出应有的作用。另一方面，法律规定的空白也使得这一制度很难顺利的发展。虽然在 理论上有国家强制力做后盾，但是在具体操作细节上却缺乏相应的规定，这种情况使得 检察人员处于尴尬境地。在司法实践中，就会出现无法可依进而形成执法空白的局面， 这些问题严重影响着对审判监督工作的进行。可以说，怎样更好的完善我国检察机关刑 事审判监督制度成为法律上的当务之急。本文通过分析刑事审判监督制度的内容，审视 我国检察机关刑事审判监督工作的现状，针对这一制度运行中存在的一些问题，总结了 问题背后的根源提出强化刑事审判监督制度的切实可行的方案；并在此基础上就检察机 关如何进一步加强刑事审判监督工作提出了一些创新性的思路以希望能为我国检察机 关刑事审判监督制度更好的完善尽绵薄之力。 关键词 刑事审判 监督 含义 问题 现状 原因 对策 I Abstract Abstract The procuratorial organs were settled as legal supervision organs in the constitution of China. Currently, it can be found from judicial practice that the procuratorial organs are facing many difficulties on criminal trial supervision system. For one thing, there do exists certain deficiency in the system itself, such as the unreasonable time of supervision which made the effectiveness of supervision can hardly at work; the ambiguity of specific made supervision turned to formalism, many of these problems seemed to be details only, but they affected the result whether the criminal trial surveillance system could play its proper role indeed. For the other, the blankness of the law regulation also made the smooth development of the system to be difficult. Theoretically, national force is behind it, but when it comes to the concrete operation details, the corresponding provisions are lacking badly which caused the embarrassment for the prosecutors. In judicial practice, there may be no law to follow and in turn the law enforcement could not meet the