Frameworkforclassroomassessmentinmathematics.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Frameworkforclassroomassessmentinmathematics.doc

FRAMEWORK FOR CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT IN MATHEMATICS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AIMS PRINCIPLES MATHEMATICAL LITERACY MATHEMATICAL COMPETENCIES COMPETENCE LEVELS THE MATHEMATICS: STRANDS BIG IDEAS METHODS FOR CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT REPORTING: FEEDBACK SCORING FROM PRINCIPLES TO PRACTICE: THE PROCESS Jan de Lange Freudenthal Institute National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science September 1999 Framework for Classroom Assessment in Mathematics This document is not the framework for classroom assessment in mathematics. One might even argue that this is not a framework. There have been several efforts to design and describe frameworks in assessment or, more specifically, in mathematics assessment. We mention several “framework” publications: Third International Mathematics and Science Study’s (TIMSS) monograph, Curriculum Frameworks for Mathematics and Science (Robitaille et al., 1993). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 1999). “A Framework for Reflecting on Assessment and Evaluation” (Aikenhead, 1997). “A Framework for Developing Cognitively Diagnostic Assessments” (Nichols, 1994). “A Framework for Authentic Assessment in Mathematics” (Lajoie, 1991). “Toward an Assessment Framework for School Mathematics” (Goldin, 1992). Goldin’s title holds for all frameworks in the sense that we are continuously on the way toward a framework. In particular, it holds for the present one. This framework is the result of some 20 years of developmental research on classroom assessment practices. These experiences made clear how important and neglected classroom assessment is—in the U.S. even more than in most other countries because of the emphasis in the U.S. on standardized tests. A most timely overview of the research literature in classroom assessment by Black and Wiliam (1998) made our task in some ways more complex but also easier. We have delibe

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档