MultidisciplinaryDesignoptimizationincorporating-CASDE.pptVIP

Multidisciplinary Design optimization incorporating Robust Design Approach to tackle the uncertainties in the design of a Reusable Aerospace Vehicle 1st Progress Seminar after 6 months (Roll No. Participating disciplines are.. Aerodynamics, Structures, Aero-thermodynamics, Navigation Guidance Control, Propulsion and Mission Trajectory. The Design Problem is… Design of a reusable technology demonstrator for the First stage of Two Stage to Orbit fully reusable Launch Vehicle. X1 to X17 – Length parameters t1,t2 – Thickness parameters ?1, ?2 – Angular variables R1,R2 – radii di – internal diameter The take off weight should not exceed 2000Kg ? GTOW ? 2T The maximum diameter of the fuselage should be between 0.9 to 1.2 m The volume requirement inside the fuselage for the avionics boxes, propulsion modules, landing gear wells and other auxiliary system are estimated as 3.0m3 The nose cone length (x1) is estimated as 2250 mm for the scramjet propulsion module performance point of view. ? x1 = 2.250m di, the internal diameter of the top half of the fuselage = 1.00 m (considering the interfacing requirement with the solid boosters of 1 m diameter) The results show that feature by feature percentage changes for one nacelle with a drag coefficient increment of 0.824% and a reduction of 2.26% on the nacelle cost. This will result to 0.421% overall reduction in DOC (Direct Operating Cost) of the transport aircraft. Tolerance relaxation tradeoff study between drag increase (loss of quality function) and manufacturing cost reduction (gain). Further research work is planned by the same group to extend the study to wing and fuselage. The goal was minimizing the variance of the height,and outer diameter of the agitator while keeping the mean on target and pull out strength 1.8 kg/sq-cm Based on cause-effect diagram seven factors were identified Three noise factors identified were - change of machine operators,