- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小针刀神经根管直接松解术治疗根型颈椎病随机双盲对照临床研究
田和炳 陆亮亮▲ 蒋晓明 李兴勇 吴 蓉 郭 旗 黄德军
四川省德阳市旌阳区中医院(人民医院)康复科,四川德阳618000
[摘要]目的 在前期探索基础上进一步研究小针刀神经根管直接松解术治疗根型颈椎病临床疗效及安全性。方法 将50例根型颈椎病按随机双盲对照法分为治疗组及对照组各25例,给予针灸、推拿、牵引及中药辨证施治内服小针刀神经根管直接松解术对照组神经根管假松解术。治疗组效率明显于对照组(P0.05),两组总疗程无显著差异(P0.05)P0.05),治疗组小针刀操作中2例出现神经根损伤,出现患肢麻木疼痛,未经特殊处理后分别于10天、15天症状体征消失。结论 小针刀神经根管直接松解术治疗神经根型颈椎病在总体疗效上有一定优势,但其不良反应较重,潜在风险较高,尚需进一步探索更安全有效的技术方案。
[关键词]小针刀;神经根管直接松解术;神经根管间接松解术;神经根型颈椎病
Clinical Study of Direct Neurolysis on Radicular Canal with acupotomy in Treating Radicular Cervical Spondylosis
Hebing Tian, Liangliang Lu▲, Xiaoming Jiang, Xingyong Li, Rong Wu, Qi Guo, Dejun Huang
Rehabilitation Department, The Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Jing yang District, Si chuan, De yang 618000
[Abstract]Objective To esearch further effect and security of direct neurolysis on radicular canal with acupotomy(DNRCA) treating the radicular type cervical spondylosis on the basis of early observation. Methods 50 cases of the radicular type cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into two groups: the treatment group and the control group. On the basis of two groups treated with acupuncture, massage, traction and Traditional Chinese drugs based on differentiation, the treatment group treated with DNRCA and the control group with pseudo acupotomy. The study was end when the patients felt no effect or aggravated. All patients were evaluated with the cumulative score of the symptoms and signs(SS), MPQ and the treatment and visiting period.. Return visit was lasted half a year after treatment. Results The effect of treatment group was obviously superior to that of the control group(P0.05). The period of treatment had no significant difference between the two groups (P0.05).Nerve damages had occurred in two cases of treatment group with pain and numbness of ill limb, and disappeared without any treatment within 10 or 15 days. Conclusion The DNRCA treating the radicular cervical spondylosis had better therapeutic effect, but more ad
文档评论(0)