论德国独立证据调查程序——兼论对我国的启示.pdfVIP

论德国独立证据调查程序——兼论对我国的启示 成要件、程序事项、目的、功能以及费用负担方式等微观层面上，将独立证据调 查程序同美国的证据开示制度、法国的预防性审前准备措施以及日本和我国台湾 地区的证据保全制度进行分析比较，对该程序同其他国家地区相关程序之间的相 似之处与差异进行了探讨。 第四部分论述了德国独立证据调查程序对完善我国证据保全制度的启示。本 文综合分析了我国现阶段民事证据保全制度的立法现状和司法困境，在制度剖析 的基础上，对该程序参考借鉴的必要性进行了分析，并对我国民事证据保全制度 改革和完善提出了相关建议，进而从功能的扩张、程序适用、独立性以及当事人 程序权的保障等方面进行了具体的制度设计。 关键词：独立证据调查程序；证据保全；证据收集；证据开示；和解协议 3 论德国独立证据调查程序——兼论对我国的启示 Abstract The German Independent Evidence Investigation Procedure emerged on the basis of the integration of the Continental Law System and the Common Law system, which results from updating and developing the traditional civil evidence preservation system so that it can be adapted to the changing features of civil disputes. The Procedure has perfected the structure and expanded the functions of the traditional evidence preservation system while having added such multiple functions and effects as evidence disclosure, fact confirmation and dispute resolution out of the court, etc. to the original system. It has been a pretrial evidence investigation procedure with an independent position and multiple functions, making a great contribution to the world ’s civil evidence system as a good example in the reformation of civil procedural system. As for China’s Evidence Preservation System, relevant stipulations appear in different laws and regulations, and differences exist between the general law and the special law. Therefore, disputes come along in law practice as a result of the imperfection of the system, especially in pretrial evidence preservation. Although the newly-revised civil procedural law has defined the pretrial evidence preservation, the system still has its flaws. Therefore, this article proposes that Taiwan’s route on this issue cou