完善行政确认判决之若干思考.docVIP

完善行政确认判决之若干思考 作者：湖北浩颂律师事务所 杨春平律师 目录 摘要 1 关键词 1 ABSTRACT 2 Keyword 2 一、对现行的行政确认判决制度的理论基础的探讨 3 （一）行政确认判决的概念及特征 3 （二）行政确认判决存在的必要性和可行性 4 二、对现行的行政确认判决制度实践中的若干问题的厘清 5 （一）无根基的确认合法判决和确认有效判决 5 （二）确认无效判决的适用缺乏统一认识、可操作性差 6 （三）确认违法判决的相关规定有欠缺 7 三、构建和完善我国行政确认判决制度的若干思路 8 （一）重新对待积极的确认判决 8 （二）确认无效判决的正确定位和适用情形 10 （三）确认违法判决相关问题的完善 12 致 谢 辞 14 参 考 文 献 15 【摘要】行政确认判决在我国现行的《行政诉讼法》中并无规定，它是在最高人民法院的司法解释中得以确立的。行政确认判决分为积极的确认判决（确认合法判决或有效判决）和消极的确认判决（确认违法判决或无效判决）两类，它的出现在弥补行政判决形式不足的同时，又暴露出诸多问题。确认合法或有效判决明显不符合判与诉相对应的原理，缺乏存在的理论根基；确认无效判决又没有统一的适用标准，实践操作性差；确认违法判决适用情形的列举性规定不能包括所有可能出现的情况，而且其相应规定对保护个人利益的漠视也遭到诸多学者的批判。完善行政确认判决，要重新审视确认合法或有效判决，将行政诉讼的价值取向转变为控制政府权力；要正确定位确认无效判决，明确规定其具体的适用情形；要改变确认违法判决适用情形列举性规定的不足，要同样重视对个人利益的保护，从而实现诸多利益之间的平衡。 【关键词】行政确认判决 行政撤销判决 抽象行政行为 【Abstract】 Administration affirms the middle currently in effect adjudging in our country there is no regulation together, it is that the judiciary in Supreme Peoples Court makes an explanation middle manage to establish. Administration affirms court decision being allotted two kinds adjudging to be active confirmation (affirm legal court decision or effective court decision) and affirm court decision (affirm the court decision breaking the law adjudging or invalidating) inactively , its appearing adjudges insufficient simultaneous of form in making up administration , reveals out a lot of problems. Affirm the obvious inconformity of legal or effective court decision judging and tell the principle responding to relatively, be short of the existence theory basis; Not unified standard suitable for use , practice operatability affirming ineffective court decision are bad; And affirm the condition that the sex breaking the law adjudging the enumeration applying to circumstance stipulates to be able to not include possessions may appear, the person acts in responses stipulating criticizing being unable to meet with a scholar a lot of to treating with indifference protecting individual benefit.Perfect administration affirms the legal