- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
the relationship closeness inventory - michael mills
The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships Ellen Berscheid, Mark Snyder Allen M. Omoto Presented by: Leslie Wheeler Megan Blazek Key Operational Definitions Frequency: Number of hours and minutes spent alone with another person during waking hours (range: 0-1,200 min.) Diversity: Number of activities from a list of 38 that the pair spends together. Strength: The amount of impact (little to very much) one person has on the other’s plans. Subjects Undergraduate students from University of Minnesota. Ages: 18-49 Goal To develop a test of interpersonal closeness using operational definitions that can be assessed by self-report. Method Ask students to identify the person with whom they consider them closest. Using questionnaires determine closeness according to frequency, diversity, and strength. Take individual scores and create an overall index of interpersonal closeness. Sum scores and weigh each subscale equally on a 10-point metric. Results Test-Retest: Paired t-tests showed no significant differences between test 1 and test 2. Romantic relationships were closer than friends or family. No sex differences Negative correlation between longevity and closeness Highly significant differences between close relationships and not close relationships Results Cont. Satisfactory reliability and validity A correlation of scores between partners were shown, but not extremely high. Conclusions Closeness is thought to be a major part of relationships and can predict certain behavior. This test provides information that spans different types of relationships. The RCI should be used in conjunction with other tests, not alone. Sample Questions Identification of person Work: Which of the following best describes your relationship with this person? (Check only one)__ co-worker __ your boss/supervisor __ your subordinate Frequency DURING THE PAST WEEK, what is the average amount of time, per day, that you spent alone with X in th
您可能关注的文档
- cytokine imbalances in multiple sclerosis a computer.doc
- d r a f t - alcoholdependence.org.doc
- damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections.doc
- data set handbook - university of california, santa cruz.doc
- data set handbook - city university of new york.doc
- databases and mobile computing - cse services.doc
- db-is strongresearchstrong for semantic web and enterprises.doc
- decision theory, behavioral decision theory, information.doc
- dc-dc converters via matlabsimulink.doc
- deducing topology of protein-protein interaction networks from.doc
文档评论(0)