addressing epistemological racism in sport strongmanagementstrong research.pdfVIP

Journal of Sport Management, 2005, 19, 464-479 © Human Kinetics, Inc. Addressing Epistemological Racism in Sport Management Research John N. Singer James Madison University Sport management scholars must begin to recognize the significance of race and ethnicity as viable epistemological considerations in research inquiry. This article discusses the concept of “epistemological racism” (Scheurich Young, 1997) and argues that critical race theory (CRT) is a legitimate epistemological and theoretical alternative to research approaches that have typically been based on the dominant worldview (i.e., Eurocentrism), and that it is an appropriate framework for conducting race-based emancipatory research in sport management. In particu- lar, because CRT focuses on issues of justice, liberation, and the empowerment of people of color in a society based on White supremacy (i.e., Eurocentrism), the primary purpose of this article is to provide sport management scholars and students with insight into how CRT’s epistemological and methodological bases could be applied to critical areas of research in our field. The article concludes with some practical suggestions for how we can address epistemological racism in our sport management research and education. Introduction In recent years sport management scholars have insisted on the need for scholars and students in our field to reconsider and reexamine their methods and assumptions when conducting research (see Chalip, 1997; Frisby, 2005). There is a specific need to do so, however, when studying and conducting research with indi- viduals from racial and ethnic groups that have historically been marginalized (e.g., Blacks or African Americans) in Western civilization. In posing