assessing the quality of strongarticlesstrong and scientific journals.pdfVIP

下载本文档

8
0
约11.29万字
约 17页
2016-03-05 发布于广东
举报
版权申诉

assessing the quality of strongarticlesstrong and scientific journals.pdf

1、本文档共17页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

assessing the quality of strongarticlesstrong and scientific journals

Copyright 2004 by the Psychology in Spain, 2004, Vol. 8. No 1, 60-76 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos. Spain ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF ARTICLES AND SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS: PROPOSAL FOR WEIGHTED IMPACT FACTOR AND A QUALITY INDEX Gualberto Buela-Casal University of Granada The impact factor and other bibliometric indices are currently used in several countries to assess the scientific production and its quality. However, the impact (or prestige) factor is rarely interpreted accurately. Available impact factors present a number of shortcomings: they only refer to citations in the previous two or three years, and they do not take into account the impact or prestige of the journals where citations appear, so that every citation is given the same value, regardless of the periodical in which it is published. In order to overcome these limitations, two indices are proposed: a mean impact fac- tor of the journals where citations appear (MIFJC) and a weighted impact factor (WIF). Additionally, other useful indices are suggested for the analysis of interaction between periodicals: a percentage of partial interaction of citations (PPIC), and a percentage of mutual interaction among citations (PMIC). This paper explains them in detail and outlines procedu- res for their calculation. Several problem areas are discussed, namely, peer review, publication policies, the credentials of referees, and assessment criteria. It is also argued that the quality of studies should not be primarily evaluated in terms of the journal in which they are published. Finally, an alternative is offered for the assessment of quality of scientific articles and journals on three bases: w