Bills and Notes - Negotiability of Note Lacking strongEndorsementstrong of.pdfVIP

Bills and Notes - Negotiability of Note Lacking strongEndorsementstrong of.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Bills and Notes - Negotiability of Note Lacking strongEndorsementstrong of.pdf

Louisiana Law R eview Volume 25 | Number 4 J une 1965 Bills and Notes - Negotiability of Note Lacking Endorsement of Special Endorsee A. L . Wright Repository Citation A. L . Wright, Bills and Notes - Nego tiability of N ote Lacking E ndorsement of Sp ecial Endorsee, 25 La. L. Rev. (1965) Available at : http:// /lalrev/vol25/iss4/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law R eviews and Journals at DigitalCommons @ LSU Law Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law R eview by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons @ LSU Law Center. For more information, please contact sarah.buras@. NOTES BILLS AND NOTES- NEGOTIABILITY OF NOTE LACKING ENDORSEMENT OF SPECIAL ENDORSEE Defendant and his son executed a promissory note made payable to themselves, endorsed the note in blank and deliv- ered it to plaintiff to represent the balance due on an auto- mobile purchased by the son. Plaintiff negotiated the note to General Motors Acceptance Corporation by special endorsement. GMAC subsequently returned the note to plaintiff without en- dorsement, and plaintiff obtained judgment against the son.1 Enforcement of the judgment left a deficiency remaining, and plaintiff sought to collect the deficiency from defendant. De- fendant urged, among other defenses, that plaintiff had no interest in the note, since it had not been endorsed by GMAC when plaintiff reacquired it. The district court rendered judg- ment for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed. The First Cir- cuit Court of Appeal affirmed. Held, endorsement in blank of a note made payable to the order of the maker converts t

文档评论(0)

b1297472 + 关注
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档