a review the application of minimally invasive surgery to pediatric urology lower urinary tract reconstructive procedures：回顾微创手术应用于小儿泌尿科下尿路重建程序.pdfVIP

Minimally Invasive Surgery A Review: The Application of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Pediatric Urology: Lower Urinary Tract Reconstructive Procedures Erica J. Traxel, Eugene A. Minevich, and Paul H. Noh This paper is one-half of a 2 part review on minimally-invasive procedures in pediatric urology. This article focuses on lower tract procedures, including ureteroureterostomy, anti-reflux surgeries, creation of continent catheterizable channels, and augmentation cystoplasty. We note important articles on pure laparoscopic as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic lower urinary tract surgeries, concentrating on their techniques and outcomes. UROLOGY 76: 115–121, 2010. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. his paper is one-half of a 2-part review on mini- interrupted or running based on surgeon preference. mally-invasive reconstructive surgery in pediatric Mean operative time, not including room set-up or cys- Turology. This article focuses on lower tract pro- toscopy and stenting, was 244 minutes. Mean length of cedures, including ureteroureterostomy, anti-reflux sur- stay was 3.5 days. There were no complications. At a geries, creation of continent catheterizable channels, and mean of 11.6 months follow-up, all were asymptomatic, augmentation cystoplasty. We note important articles on with complete resolution of hydronephrosis in 2 and pure laparoscopic as well as robotic-assisted laparoscopic improvement in one. The authors specifically advocated lower urinary tract reconstructive surgeries, focusing on robotic assistance for efficient suturing.2 their techniques and outcomes. Similarly, there are few reports of laparoscopic ureter-