- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Challenging an arbitration award – some key principles.doc
The Arbitration Act 1996 – Ninth Annual Review
Anti-suit injunctions and procedural irregularity
Khawar Qureshi
The Arbitration Act 1996 (“the Act”) has been in force for the large part since 31st January 1997. As we approach the 10th anniversary of the coming into force of the Act, anecdotal evidence suggests that there has been a consistent increase in the number of arbitrations seated in London – at least 8,000 during 2005 according to some informed estimates (conservative as these are bound to be because of the confidential nature of arbitration proceedings).
Approximately 60 arbitration applications have been considered pursuant to the Act in 2005. Of those, it would appear that a very small percentage overcome the “permission” threshold or ultimately succeed on the merits, albeit within increasingly tight timetables being set by the Court.
However, certain fundamental questions remain (and, it is respectfully submitted, should form the basis of a systematic review of the Act):
Has the Act struck the right balance?
Is there inconsistency in some of the provisions of the Act and the approach of the Courts?
Is it correct to characterise the Act as being rooted purely in a desire to give effect to party autonomy (the consensual approach), or in truth, is the Act simply a reflection of a policy decision by the State to permit arbitration to take place, subject to certain conditions (the concessional approach)?
(A). Some context.
The 1996 Act contains 110 sections and 4 schedules. The Bill which ultimately formed the 1996 Act was accompanied by a report prepared by a committee known as the DAC, chaired by Lord Saville of Newdigate (“the DAC report”).
The DAC Report is replete with references to the need to enhance party autonomy.
Indeed Section 1 of the Act appears to confirm that the parties to arbitration are in fact signing up to a largely self contained system to achieve private justice.
Section 1 – provides as follows;
“1. The provisions of this Part
您可能关注的文档
- A Scan-Island Based Design Enabling Pre-Bond Testability in.ppt
- A Secure Access Control Mechanism against Internet Crackers.ppt
- A Separate Peace - EZ_Website.doc
- A Simulation Analysis of the Initialization of DOCSIS.doc
- A Single-supply True Voltage Level Shifter.ppt
- A Somatic Alphabet Approach to Sensitive Skin - cba.mit.edu.ppt
- A Sound of Thunder - RM Education.doc
- A Sound of Thunder.ppt
- A Streetcar Named Desire - Miss Thompson Media.ppt
- A Streetcar Named Desire.doc
- CHANGING FAMILIES, CHANGING FOOD.ppt
- Chapter 1 - William Stallings, Data and Computer.ppt
- Chapter 12 - William Stallings, Data and Computer.ppt
- Chapter 18 - William Stallings, Data and Computer.ppt
- Chapter 1A - BluWiki.doc
- Chapter 2 The Strategic Context.ppt
- Chapter 25 - The Urinary System.ppt
- Chapter 42.doc
- Chapter 6 Modeling and Representation.ppt
- Chapter 7 - William Stallings, Data and Computer.ppt
文档评论(0)