- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Dilemmas and Moral Realism - University Home page.doc
Published in Utilitas, 1999.
Dilemmas and Moral Realism
Nick Zangwill
Glasgow University
Abstract
I distinguish two different arguments against cognitivism in Bernard Williams’ writings on moral dilemmas. The first turns on there being a truth of the matter about what we ought to do in moral a dilemma. That argument can be met by appealing to our epistemic shortcomings and to pro tanto obligations. However, those responses make no headway with the second argument which concerns the rationality of the moral regret that we feel in dilemma situations. I show how the rationality of moral regret can be explained on an ‘independent desire’ model. And I show how Williams’ second argument only appears to have force because of a certain faulty way of conceiving of the issue over cognitivism. But Williams’ argument rightly alerts us to the rational role of desire in our moral thought.
A generation ago, Bernard Williams urged that the existence of moral dilemmas creates a serious difficulty for the moral realist. His argument has the structure of a modus tollens: if moral realism is true, genuine moral ‘dilemmas’ or ‘conflicts’ cannot arise; but there are genuine dilemmas or conflicts; so moral realism is not true. The argument can be put equally well in terms of whether realism allows that dilemmas or conflicts have certain properties, rather than in terms of whether they can arise at all. But nothing hangs on this.
I shall separate two arguments that can be found in Williams’ papers. One of these arguments has caught the attention of the philosophical public, generating a large literature. The other argument has been neglected. But, as we shall see, this neglected argument is the more powerful of the two. Those who have replied to Williams, have deflected the first argument, but not the second. In spite of the critical attention that has been lavished on Williams’ papers, what is most interesting has not yet been extracted. I shall present my own view of moral dilemmas
您可能关注的文档
- Caching in Backtracking Search - University of Toronto.ppt
- Cake Cutting is Not a Piece of Cake - Computer Science at RPI.ppt
- Calendar effects in Chinese stock market - ePrints Soton.doc
- Calendar of Events - Milwaukee Portal.doc
- Calibration and Editing - hartrao.ac.za.ppt
- Can a Monkey with a Computer Create Art.ppt
- Can foreign aid buy growth - University of Birmingham.ppt
- Can Internet Video-on-Demand Be Profitable.ppt
- Can school competition improve standards The case of faith.ppt
- CAPM is CRAP, or, The Dead Parrot lives.doc
- Director Responsibility for IT Governance.doc
- DISCLOSURE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW - adminlaw.org.uk.doc
- Discourse Analysis and Psycho-Analysis.doc
- Disruptive Programming Language Technologies.ppt
- Dissent Accountable Anonymous Group Messaging.ppt
- Distributed Crossbar Schedulers.ppt
- Do Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers Reduce Poverty and.ppt
- Do We (Now) Collect Any Revenue From Taxing Capital Income.doc
- docs.oasis-open.org.doc
- Does debt affect firm value in Taiwan.doc
最近下载
- 《装配式多层混凝土墙板建筑技术规程》.pdf VIP
- 建设工程造价咨询业务指导规程.docx VIP
- 监狱电网工程施工方案(3篇).docx
- 2025年中国婴儿纸尿裤市场调查研究报告.docx
- 鼎捷ERP全套操作参考手册.doc VIP
- 牛津译林六上Unit 3 Holiday fun Cartoon time课件.ppt VIP
- 「备战2024高考语文」重点古诗文篇目默写复习:《谏太宗十思疏》理解性默写精选.docx VIP
- 2025年秋最新人教版七年级上册英语单词默写版 .pdf VIP
- 普通高中语文课程标准(2017年版2020年修订).pdf VIP
- 教育事业发展“十五五”规划.docx
文档评论(0)