- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
地球科学数据长期保存祥解.ppt
Text in box Testing is one important practical means that contributes to assessing to correctness of a service implementation. As usual, services under test are required to undergo some specific verification and validation procedures. However, the complexity of geo services establishes additional problems; one of them, which we address in this work, is related to dependency issues. Such dependencies often already exist within one specification against which a service is to be assessed. Moreover, specifications themselves often refer to other specifications – either because some pre-existing specifications are used, as in the case of relying on standards, or because the specification on hand is itself modularized into different documents between which, consequently, logical relationships exist. Further problems include interface conformance evaluation, test maturity evaluation, global validity evaluation, and the question of how to craft specifications in a way which eases rigid testing. One use case for conformance testing where this becomes particularly apparent is the Web Coverage Service (WCS) 2.0 Interface Standard issued by the Open Geo?spatial Consortium (OGC). The WCS Core relies on the GML Application Schema for Coverages which contains standardized attribute descriptions; the Core itself, which defines service functionalities mandatory for every implementation claiming to conform with the WCS standard, consists of 42 requirements which are often logically connected. Extension standards add further data structures, functionality, or usage requirements. Currently, three extensions have been adopted as standards and about ten more are in the pipeline of the standards working group. Core and extension documents internally contain requirements classes as modularization units; WCS choose to have, whenever possible, only one requirements class in the Core for reasons of simplicity. Application Profiles, finally, bundle the Core plus a custom set of extensions into
文档评论(0)